Evaluation of the effectiveness of double task. by Fan Yang (1413)

Subjects:

Binary classification task performance. by Thierry Jean (20691795)

Subjects:

Ordinal regression task performance. by Thierry Jean (20691795)

Subjects:

Dual-task learning across training visits for simple and complex reaction times. by Swati M. Surkar (8399427)

Subjects:

Examples of different stimuli for all subtasks of the task. by Marcel F. Hinss (14675457)

Subjects:

Examples of the different task-rule congruency conditions. by Marcel F. Hinss (14675457)

Subjects:

Connectivity changes that underlie the main effects of hand and task epoch. by Ali Rezaei (4238548)

“…Positive (red) and negative (blue) values show increases and decreases in connectivity, respectively, for Baseline to Early learning/transfer (leftmost panel) and for Early to Late learning/transfer (adjacent right panel). …”

Task procedure. by George Zacharopoulos (5660800)

Larger example of stimuli with cue relevant for Task 3. by Marcel F. Hinss (14675457)

Subjects:

A) Prefrontal cortex (PFC) activation during simple reaction time task (SRT); B) Vestibular cortex (VEST) activation during SRT; C) PFC activation during complex reaction time (CRT... by Swati M. Surkar (8399427)

Subjects:

Study Block Design: Task Structure and Trial Distribution. by Swati M. Surkar (8399427)

Subjects:

Penalty conversions yield large practical decreases, but robustness and generalizability of result are limited by data quality and sample selection. by Ryan J. Treves (13527735)

Post-hoc analysis for visit-wise differences in dual-task learning. Significant differences between visits are indicated with an asterisk (*). by Swati M. Surkar (8399427)

Subjects:

RTs (in ms, bars) and ACC (in %, line) across all tasks, with 95% confidence interval. by Marcel F. Hinss (14675457)

Subjects:

VMR task and subject behavior. by Corson N. Areshenkoff (20378635)

“…Using these report trials, we derived estimates of subjects’ total explicit and implicit learning during the task. (<b>B</b>) Error curves for individual subjects. …”

Experimental procedure timeline and sequence of visits for dual-task training. by Swati M. Surkar (8399427)

Subjects:

The process of learning and remembering in RECOLLECT. by Alexandra R. van den Berg (20490255)

RT (in ms, bars) and ACC (in %, line) for the effect of congruency task convergence, with 95% confidence interval. by Marcel F. Hinss (14675457)

Subjects:

Retention and extinction of operant learning. by Ella R. Dockendorf (21533334)

Training and validation loss per epoch for different pretext task combinations. by Shima Ayyoubi Nezhad (21276429)