List of network connections predictive of individual SoF values, together with their β weights, in decreasing order. by Yinan Xu (12440894)

“…<p>List of network connections predictive of individual SoF values, together with their β weights, in decreasing order.…”

Evaluation of the effectiveness of double task. by Fan Yang (1413)

Subjects:

Binary classification task performance. by Thierry Jean (20691795)

Subjects:

Ordinal regression task performance. by Thierry Jean (20691795)

Subjects:

TITAN decreaser diatom heatmap. by Brent J. Bellinger (21156150)

Dual-task learning across training visits for simple and complex reaction times. by Swati M. Surkar (8399427)

Subjects:

Yearly crude rates normalized by their 1999 value. by Tony Wong (779773)

“…<p>Values below 1 indicate crude rate decreases relative to their 1999 value, those above 1 indicate increases. …”

Examples of different stimuli for all subtasks of the task. by Marcel F. Hinss (14675457)

Subjects:

Examples of the different task-rule congruency conditions. by Marcel F. Hinss (14675457)

Subjects:

Task procedure. by George Zacharopoulos (5660800)

Larger example of stimuli with cue relevant for Task 3. by Marcel F. Hinss (14675457)

Subjects:

Heat map of correlations of the FEET system with 95% CI values within brackets. by Cylie Williams (3446018)

Subjects:

Analysis of tea output value distribution and growth- decrease rate of provinces. by Kun Qin (177235)

A) Prefrontal cortex (PFC) activation during simple reaction time task (SRT); B) Vestibular cortex (VEST) activation during SRT; C) PFC activation during complex reaction time (CRT... by Swati M. Surkar (8399427)

Subjects:

Study Block Design: Task Structure and Trial Distribution. by Swati M. Surkar (8399427)

Subjects:

Tissue, days post-infection (dpi) and the top 10 most significant genes with increased and decreased expression with valid gene symbols for the response contrasts. by Gillian P. McHugo (8965919)

Post-hoc analysis for visit-wise differences in dual-task learning. Significant differences between visits are indicated with an asterisk (*). by Swati M. Surkar (8399427)

Subjects:

RTs (in ms, bars) and ACC (in %, line) across all tasks, with 95% confidence interval. by Marcel F. Hinss (14675457)

Subjects:

VMR task and subject behavior. by Corson N. Areshenkoff (20378635)

“…Using these report trials, we derived estimates of subjects’ total explicit and implicit learning during the task. (<b>B</b>) Error curves for individual subjects. …”

Decrease in loss during the training process. by Muhammad Idrees (92773)