Search alternatives:
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
may mean » may lead (Expand Search), a mean (Expand Search)
a larger » a large (Expand Search), _ larger (Expand Search), _ large (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
may mean » may lead (Expand Search), a mean (Expand Search)
a larger » a large (Expand Search), _ larger (Expand Search), _ large (Expand Search)
-
1
Effective contact rate over time for the different modelling scenarios considered: fixed, continuously increasing, continuously decreasing and with a step-decrease.
Published 2025“…<p>Effective contact rate over time for the different modelling scenarios considered: fixed, continuously increasing, continuously decreasing and with a step-decrease.</p>…”
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
Variables for the bromeliad agent representing a single <i>T. utriculata</i> rosette.
Published 2025Subjects: -
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
The introduction of mutualisms into assembled communities increases their connectance and complexity while decreasing their richness.
Published 2025“…(C) Mutualism also promotes an increase in network connectance when introduced into assembled communities, while stopping mutualistic interactions from entering an assembled system slowly decreases it. (D) As a result, the introduction of mutualistic interactions promotes a growth in complexity in communities where it was once established as low, while stopping the introduction of further mutualistic interactions causes a slight decrease in complexity. …”
-
18
Knock-down of DYRK1A decreases HBV RNAs levels in HBV-infected dHepaRG cells.
Published 2024Subjects: -
19
Modelled policy outcomes, with posterior values for individual nodes ranked from 1-5 across the parties - Green, Reform UK, Liberal Democrat, Conservative, and Labour, where 1 is the lowest rank and 5 is the highest. The parties are ranked for each policy node in the network (e.g., income tax), based on the direction of change (“performance indicator”) stated in the first column (e.g., lowest, highest, most, improvement). For example, a value of 5 for Green tax means that green tax is lowest under Reform UK’s policies, while a value of 1 means that green tax is highest under the Green Party’s policies. Larger text in bold and italic font indicates that the directional change (i.e., increase or decrease) of a node under a party’s policies is consistent with the direction indicated, whereas black text indicates an opposite directional change (e.g., income tax is predicted to decrease under Reform UK in alignment with the performance indicator, and increase under Green and Labour).
Published 2025“…Larger text in bold and italic font indicates that the directional change (i.e., increase or decrease) of a node under a party’s policies is consistent with the direction indicated, whereas black text indicates an opposite directional change (e.g., income tax is predicted to decrease under Reform UK in alignment with the performance indicator, and increase under Green and Labour).…”
-
20
Knockdown of ATP2C1 results in a minor decrease of [Ca<sup>2+</sup>] in WPB.
Published 2025Subjects: