Search alternatives:
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
based decrease » caused decreased (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search), based defense (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
target based » target case (Expand Search), target dose (Expand Search), target area (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreasing (Expand Search)
a larger » a large (Expand Search), _ larger (Expand Search), _ large (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
based decrease » caused decreased (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search), based defense (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
target based » target case (Expand Search), target dose (Expand Search), target area (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreasing (Expand Search)
a larger » a large (Expand Search), _ larger (Expand Search), _ large (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
Effective contact rate over time for the different modelling scenarios considered: fixed, continuously increasing, continuously decreasing and with a step-decrease.
Published 2025“…<p>Effective contact rate over time for the different modelling scenarios considered: fixed, continuously increasing, continuously decreasing and with a step-decrease.</p>…”
-
4
Increase in physical activity (100 step, 500 steps or 1000 steps) after the challenge according to decrease in screen time < or ≥60 minutes.
Published 2024“…<p>Increase in physical activity (100 step, 500 steps or 1000 steps) after the challenge according to decrease in screen time < or ≥60 minutes.…”
-
5
-
6
-
7
Decrease in Total Cholesterol level based on Salt Intake.
Published 2025“…<p>Level of total cholesterol decreasing based on salt intake.</p>…”
-
8
Decrease in Blood Glucose level based on Education Level.
Published 2025“…<p>Level of total cholesterol decreasing based on salt intake.</p>…”
-
9
The introduction of mutualisms into assembled communities increases their connectance and complexity while decreasing their richness.
Published 2025“…(C) Mutualism also promotes an increase in network connectance when introduced into assembled communities, while stopping mutualistic interactions from entering an assembled system slowly decreases it. (D) As a result, the introduction of mutualistic interactions promotes a growth in complexity in communities where it was once established as low, while stopping the introduction of further mutualistic interactions causes a slight decrease in complexity. …”
-
10
ECoG timescales decrease during spatial attention.
Published 2025“…Bottom: timescales significantly decrease during covert attention relative to the attend-out condition (two locations: <i>p</i> = 0.0244; four locations: <i>p</i> < 0.0001; mean ± SEM; whiskers indicate maximum and minimum; dots correspond to individual electrodes). …”
-
11
Characteristics of patients who decreased their screen time by more than 60 minutes after the challenge.
Published 2024“…<p>Characteristics of patients who decreased their screen time by more than 60 minutes after the challenge.…”
-
12
Loss of ECRG4 expression decreases neutrophil mobilization from bone marrow reserves.
Published 2024Subjects: -
13
-
14
-
15
Cinacalcet administered early in the inactive phase markedly decrease parathyroid Ki-67 index.
Published 2025“…All groups were compared by Kruskal Wallis test with <i>post hoc</i> test after Dunn with Bonferroni adjustment showing significant decreased Ki-67 labeling index of <i>Cina1</i> compared to <i>Cina2</i> (p = 0.006) and the untreated CKD groups (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0002, respectively). …”
-
16
Expression of lipid biosynthetic genes is decreased with polyamine depletion.
Published 2024Subjects: -
17
-
18
-
19
-
20
Validation of genetic markers for risk of OA or knee OA for decrease in minJSW.
Published 2025“…<p><b>(A)</b> Manhattan plot of minJSW decrease at 24 months. The Manhattan plots show the -log10(P) values of all ~ 1,5 million SNPs against their position. …”