Search alternatives:
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
site decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search), rate decreased (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
a marked » _ marked (Expand Search), a marker (Expand Search), a market (Expand Search)
a linear » _ linear (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
site decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search), rate decreased (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
a marked » _ marked (Expand Search), a marker (Expand Search), a market (Expand Search)
a linear » _ linear (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
Modeling the Shape and Stability of Co Nanoparticles as a Function of Size and Support Interactions through DFT Calculations and Monte Carlo Simulations
Published 2025“…We report a marked increase in step and kink sites at the expense of terraces with increasing particle size, which we linked to the experimentally observed increase in turnover frequency (TOF). …”
-
3
<b>When more isn’t better: Sperm competition decreases fertilization success and motile sperm in two sea urchin species</b>
Published 2025“…Additionally, variation in fertilization success among males within the same experiment suggests the presence of gamete compatibility effects. We suggest that chemical interactions via seminal fluid from competitors, or via<i> </i>competitive blocking of the sperm-binding site by incompatible sperm, may cause reduced motility and fertilization under sperm competition. …”
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
Linear covariate analysis of prognostically significant metabolites. Presenting the effect sizes of metabolites that showed significant differences among prognostic groups in ICU-treated COVID-19 patients. Metabolites were included based on an F-value > 2.5 and a p-value < 0.05. Metabolites marked with a single asterisk (*) were significant in both two-way ANOVA and ASCA, whereas those marked with double asterisks (**) were significant only in two-way ANOVA....
Published 2025“…Metabolites were included based on an F-value > 2.5 and a p-value < 0.05. Metabolites marked with a single asterisk (*) were significant in both two-way ANOVA and ASCA, whereas those marked with double asterisks (**) were significant only in two-way ANOVA. …”
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20