<b>Opti2Phase</b>: Python scripts for two-stage focal reducer by Morgan Najera (21540776)

“…</li></ul><p dir="ltr">The scripts rely on the following Python packages. Where available, repository links are provided:</p><ol><li><b>NumPy</b>, version 1.22.1</li><li><b>SciPy</b>, version 1.7.3</li><li><b>PyGAD</b>, version 3.0.1 — https://pygad.readthedocs.io/en/latest/#</li><li><b>bees-algorithm</b>, version 1.0.2 — https://pypi.org/project/bees-algorithm</li><li><b>KrakenOS</b>, version 1.0.0.19 — https://github.com/Garchupiter/Kraken-Optical-Simulator</li><li><b>matplotlib</b>, version 3.5.2</li></ol><p dir="ltr">All scripts are modular and organized to reflect the design stages described in the manuscript.…”

Landscape17 by Vlad Carare (22092515)

“…We validated the convergence, grid, and spin settings against published data from rMD17, using the appropriate functional and basis set: PBE/def2-SVP. We achieved energies and forces within 0.1 meV/atom and 5 meV/Å respectively, well within the standard acceptable resolution of 1 meV/atom and 10 meV/Å.…”

An Ecological Benchmark of Photo Editing Software: A Comparative Analysis of Local vs. Cloud Workflows by Pierre-Alexis DELAROCHE (22092572)

“…Performance Profiling Algorithms Energy Measurement Methodology # Pseudo-algorithmic representation of measurement protocol def capture_energy_metrics(workflow_type: WorkflowEnum, asset_vector: List[PhotoAsset]) -> EnergyProfile: baseline_power = sample_idle_power_draw(duration=30) with PowerMonitoringContext() as pmc: start_timestamp = rdtsc() # Read time-stamp counter if workflow_type == WorkflowEnum.LOCAL: result = execute_local_pipeline(asset_vector) elif workflow_type == WorkflowEnum.CLOUD: result = execute_cloud_pipeline(asset_vector) end_timestamp = rdtsc() energy_profile = EnergyProfile( duration=cycles_to_seconds(end_timestamp - start_timestamp), peak_power=pmc.get_peak_consumption(), average_power=pmc.get_mean_consumption(), total_energy=integrate_power_curve(pmc.get_power_trace()) ) return energy_profile Statistical Analysis Framework Our analytical pipeline employs advanced statistical methodologies including: Variance Decomposition: ANOVA with nested factors for hardware configuration effects Regression Analysis: Generalized Linear Models (GLM) with log-link functions for energy modeling Temporal Analysis: Fourier transform-based frequency domain analysis of power consumption patterns Cluster Analysis: K-means clustering with Euclidean distance metrics for workflow classification Data Validation and Quality Assurance Measurement Uncertainty Quantification All energy measurements incorporate systematic and random error propagation analysis: Instrument Precision: ±0.1W for CPU power, ±0.5W for GPU power Temporal Resolution: 1ms sampling with Nyquist frequency considerations Calibration Protocol: NIST-traceable power standards with periodic recalibration Environmental Controls: Temperature-compensated measurements in climate-controlled facility Outlier Detection Algorithms Statistical outliers are identified using the Interquartile Range (IQR) method with Tukey's fence criteria (Q₁ - 1.5×IQR, Q₃ + 1.5×IQR). …”