Search alternatives:
proof implementations » proof implementation (Expand Search), prior implementations (Expand Search), pilot implementation (Expand Search)
python model » python tool (Expand Search), action model (Expand Search), motion model (Expand Search)
method proof » method proved (Expand Search)
proof implementations » proof implementation (Expand Search), prior implementations (Expand Search), pilot implementation (Expand Search)
python model » python tool (Expand Search), action model (Expand Search), motion model (Expand Search)
method proof » method proved (Expand Search)
-
161
Internal changes of the specimen 1.55 to 1.60.
Published 2025“…The ABAQUS finite – element software was used, and a random aggregate placement algorithm for RCA was implemented by writing the built – in scripting language Python to generate digital specimens. …”
-
162
Internal changes of the specimen of 1.70 to 1.75.
Published 2025“…The ABAQUS finite – element software was used, and a random aggregate placement algorithm for RCA was implemented by writing the built – in scripting language Python to generate digital specimens. …”
-
163
Internal changes of the specimen of 0.89 to 1.
Published 2025“…The ABAQUS finite – element software was used, and a random aggregate placement algorithm for RCA was implemented by writing the built – in scripting language Python to generate digital specimens. …”
-
164
-
165
Flow chart of the proposed methodology.
Published 2025“…This paper examines various consensus methods, including PoW (Proof of Work), PBFT(Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance), its variants, and node reputation management techniques such as the Beta Reputation Model and EigenTrust score, to determine the most suitable approach for healthcare applications. …”
-
166
Reputation scores of nodes over time.
Published 2025“…This paper examines various consensus methods, including PoW (Proof of Work), PBFT(Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance), its variants, and node reputation management techniques such as the Beta Reputation Model and EigenTrust score, to determine the most suitable approach for healthcare applications. …”
-
167
Latency comparison of PBFT and BR-PBFT.
Published 2025“…This paper examines various consensus methods, including PoW (Proof of Work), PBFT(Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance), its variants, and node reputation management techniques such as the Beta Reputation Model and EigenTrust score, to determine the most suitable approach for healthcare applications. …”
-
168
States in a transaction flow.
Published 2025“…This paper examines various consensus methods, including PoW (Proof of Work), PBFT(Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance), its variants, and node reputation management techniques such as the Beta Reputation Model and EigenTrust score, to determine the most suitable approach for healthcare applications. …”
-
169
BR-PBFT consensus with VRF.
Published 2025“…This paper examines various consensus methods, including PoW (Proof of Work), PBFT(Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance), its variants, and node reputation management techniques such as the Beta Reputation Model and EigenTrust score, to determine the most suitable approach for healthcare applications. …”
-
170
PBFT variants with byzantine nodes.
Published 2025“…This paper examines various consensus methods, including PoW (Proof of Work), PBFT(Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance), its variants, and node reputation management techniques such as the Beta Reputation Model and EigenTrust score, to determine the most suitable approach for healthcare applications. …”
-
171
BR-PBFT vs SBFT.
Published 2025“…This paper examines various consensus methods, including PoW (Proof of Work), PBFT(Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance), its variants, and node reputation management techniques such as the Beta Reputation Model and EigenTrust score, to determine the most suitable approach for healthcare applications. …”
-
172
Workflow diagram of the proposed solution.
Published 2025“…This paper examines various consensus methods, including PoW (Proof of Work), PBFT(Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance), its variants, and node reputation management techniques such as the Beta Reputation Model and EigenTrust score, to determine the most suitable approach for healthcare applications. …”
-
173
Network graph of beta reputation score.
Published 2025“…This paper examines various consensus methods, including PoW (Proof of Work), PBFT(Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance), its variants, and node reputation management techniques such as the Beta Reputation Model and EigenTrust score, to determine the most suitable approach for healthcare applications. …”
-
174
PBFT variants without byzantine nodes.
Published 2025“…This paper examines various consensus methods, including PoW (Proof of Work), PBFT(Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance), its variants, and node reputation management techniques such as the Beta Reputation Model and EigenTrust score, to determine the most suitable approach for healthcare applications. …”
-
175
Network graph of eigen trust score.
Published 2025“…This paper examines various consensus methods, including PoW (Proof of Work), PBFT(Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance), its variants, and node reputation management techniques such as the Beta Reputation Model and EigenTrust score, to determine the most suitable approach for healthcare applications. …”
-
176
PoW vs PBFT based on resource utilization.
Published 2025“…This paper examines various consensus methods, including PoW (Proof of Work), PBFT(Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance), its variants, and node reputation management techniques such as the Beta Reputation Model and EigenTrust score, to determine the most suitable approach for healthcare applications. …”
-
177
PoW vs PBFT based on consensus stability.
Published 2025“…This paper examines various consensus methods, including PoW (Proof of Work), PBFT(Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance), its variants, and node reputation management techniques such as the Beta Reputation Model and EigenTrust score, to determine the most suitable approach for healthcare applications. …”
-
178
-
179
Performance Benchmark: SBMLNetwork vs. SBMLDiagrams Auto-layout.
Published 2025“…<p>Log–log plot of median wall-clock time for SBMLNetwork’s C++-based auto-layout engine (blue circles, solid fit) and SBMLDiagrams’ implementation of the pure-Python NetworkX spring_layout algorithm (red squares, dashed fit), applied to synthetic SBML models containing 20–2,000 species, with a fixed 4:1 species-to-reaction ratio. …”
-
180
<b>Use case codes of the DDS3 and DDS4 datasets for bacillus segmentation and tuberculosis diagnosis, respectively</b>
Published 2025“…<p dir="ltr"><b>Use case codes of the DDS3 and DDS4 datasets for bacillus segmentation and tuberculosis diagnosis, respectively</b></p><p dir="ltr">The code was developed in the Google Collaboratory environment, using Python version 3.7.13, with TensorFlow 2.8.2. …”