Showing 1,561 - 1,580 results of 21,342 for search '(( ((significance mean) OR (significance test)) decrease ) OR ( significant decrease decrease ))', query time: 0.56s Refine Results
  1. 1561
  2. 1562
  3. 1563
  4. 1564
  5. 1565
  6. 1566
  7. 1567

    Estimated marginal means (± SE) of durations of momentary frequency of highest amplitude (MFHA). by Micha Keller (11312748)

    Published 2025
    “…The most marked change can be seen during CVH intervention, with a significant increase in LF and a significant decrease in IM duration.…”
  8. 1568
  9. 1569
  10. 1570
  11. 1571
  12. 1572

    Means scores of CAM and CAM-MYCS. by Senay Yildirim-Kahriman (22693464)

    Published 2025
    “…A moderate negative correlation was observed between CAM and CAM-MYCS scores (r = −0.511; p < 0.001), indicating that increased awareness of real causes is associated with decreased belief in myths. Regression analysis revealed that CAM scores were significantly predicted by academic year, being in the normal Body Mass Index (BMI) spectrum, and by having attended an oncology course (R² = 0.142; p < 0.001), whereas CAM-MYCS scores were predicted by academic year and high BMI values (R² = 0.072; p < 0.001). …”
  13. 1573
  14. 1574

    Internal structure of an LSTM cell. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…Further integration of Spearman correlation analysis and PCA dimensionality reduction created multidimensional feature sets, revealing substantial accuracy improvements: The BiLSTM model achieved an 83.6% cumulative MAE reduction from 1.65 (raw data) to 0.27 (STL-PCA), while traditional models like Prophet showed an 82.2% MAE decrease after feature engineering optimization. Finally, the Beluga Whale Optimization (BWO)-tuned STL-PCA-BWO-BiLSTM hybrid model delivered optimal performance on test sets (RMSE = 0.22, MAE = 0.16, MAPE = 0.99%, ), exhibiting 40.7% higher accuracy than unoptimized BiLSTM (MAE = 0.27). …”
  15. 1575

    Prediction effect of each model after STL. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…Further integration of Spearman correlation analysis and PCA dimensionality reduction created multidimensional feature sets, revealing substantial accuracy improvements: The BiLSTM model achieved an 83.6% cumulative MAE reduction from 1.65 (raw data) to 0.27 (STL-PCA), while traditional models like Prophet showed an 82.2% MAE decrease after feature engineering optimization. Finally, the Beluga Whale Optimization (BWO)-tuned STL-PCA-BWO-BiLSTM hybrid model delivered optimal performance on test sets (RMSE = 0.22, MAE = 0.16, MAPE = 0.99%, ), exhibiting 40.7% higher accuracy than unoptimized BiLSTM (MAE = 0.27). …”
  16. 1576

    The kernel density plot for data of each feature. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…Further integration of Spearman correlation analysis and PCA dimensionality reduction created multidimensional feature sets, revealing substantial accuracy improvements: The BiLSTM model achieved an 83.6% cumulative MAE reduction from 1.65 (raw data) to 0.27 (STL-PCA), while traditional models like Prophet showed an 82.2% MAE decrease after feature engineering optimization. Finally, the Beluga Whale Optimization (BWO)-tuned STL-PCA-BWO-BiLSTM hybrid model delivered optimal performance on test sets (RMSE = 0.22, MAE = 0.16, MAPE = 0.99%, ), exhibiting 40.7% higher accuracy than unoptimized BiLSTM (MAE = 0.27). …”
  17. 1577

    Analysis of raw data prediction results. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…Further integration of Spearman correlation analysis and PCA dimensionality reduction created multidimensional feature sets, revealing substantial accuracy improvements: The BiLSTM model achieved an 83.6% cumulative MAE reduction from 1.65 (raw data) to 0.27 (STL-PCA), while traditional models like Prophet showed an 82.2% MAE decrease after feature engineering optimization. Finally, the Beluga Whale Optimization (BWO)-tuned STL-PCA-BWO-BiLSTM hybrid model delivered optimal performance on test sets (RMSE = 0.22, MAE = 0.16, MAPE = 0.99%, ), exhibiting 40.7% higher accuracy than unoptimized BiLSTM (MAE = 0.27). …”
  18. 1578

    Flowchart of the STL. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…Further integration of Spearman correlation analysis and PCA dimensionality reduction created multidimensional feature sets, revealing substantial accuracy improvements: The BiLSTM model achieved an 83.6% cumulative MAE reduction from 1.65 (raw data) to 0.27 (STL-PCA), while traditional models like Prophet showed an 82.2% MAE decrease after feature engineering optimization. Finally, the Beluga Whale Optimization (BWO)-tuned STL-PCA-BWO-BiLSTM hybrid model delivered optimal performance on test sets (RMSE = 0.22, MAE = 0.16, MAPE = 0.99%, ), exhibiting 40.7% higher accuracy than unoptimized BiLSTM (MAE = 0.27). …”
  19. 1579

    SARIMA predicts season components. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…Further integration of Spearman correlation analysis and PCA dimensionality reduction created multidimensional feature sets, revealing substantial accuracy improvements: The BiLSTM model achieved an 83.6% cumulative MAE reduction from 1.65 (raw data) to 0.27 (STL-PCA), while traditional models like Prophet showed an 82.2% MAE decrease after feature engineering optimization. Finally, the Beluga Whale Optimization (BWO)-tuned STL-PCA-BWO-BiLSTM hybrid model delivered optimal performance on test sets (RMSE = 0.22, MAE = 0.16, MAPE = 0.99%, ), exhibiting 40.7% higher accuracy than unoptimized BiLSTM (MAE = 0.27). …”
  20. 1580

    BWO-BiLSTM model prediction results. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…Further integration of Spearman correlation analysis and PCA dimensionality reduction created multidimensional feature sets, revealing substantial accuracy improvements: The BiLSTM model achieved an 83.6% cumulative MAE reduction from 1.65 (raw data) to 0.27 (STL-PCA), while traditional models like Prophet showed an 82.2% MAE decrease after feature engineering optimization. Finally, the Beluga Whale Optimization (BWO)-tuned STL-PCA-BWO-BiLSTM hybrid model delivered optimal performance on test sets (RMSE = 0.22, MAE = 0.16, MAPE = 0.99%, ), exhibiting 40.7% higher accuracy than unoptimized BiLSTM (MAE = 0.27). …”