Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant source » significant burden (Expand Search)
significant all » significant anti (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search), significant _ (Expand Search)
Showing 881 - 900 results of 21,342 for search '(( ((significant all) OR (significant source)) decrease ) OR ( significant decrease decrease ))', query time: 0.46s Refine Results
  1. 881
    Agreement in the order of district towns in the results of the SD-TOPSIS application in space ‐ combination A vs. B1.

    Agreement in the order of district towns in the results of the SD-TOPSIS application in space ‐ combination A vs. B1. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  2. 882
    Agreement with tolerance in the order of district towns in the results of SD-TOPSIS application in space ‐ combination A vs. B1.

    Agreement with tolerance in the order of district towns in the results of SD-TOPSIS application in space ‐ combination A vs. B1. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  3. 883
    A set of 5 criteria for the needs of multi-criteria evaluation–combination A.

    A set of 5 criteria for the needs of multi-criteria evaluation–combination A. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  4. 884
    The importance of entry criteria from the point of view of the SD method ‐ combinations D1 –D10.

    The importance of entry criteria from the point of view of the SD method ‐ combinations D1 –D10. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  5. 885
    Upper quartile of district towns evaluated by the SD-TOPSIS technique ‐ combination of A, B1, B2 and C1.

    Upper quartile of district towns evaluated by the SD-TOPSIS technique ‐ combination of A, B1, B2 and C1. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  6. 886
    Comparison of the regressor within the regression model of SD-TOPSIS technique results across groups of combinations - B1-B5 vs. C1-C10 vs. D1-D10.

    Comparison of the regressor within the regression model of SD-TOPSIS technique results across groups of combinations - B1-B5 vs. C1-C10 vs. D1-D10. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  7. 887
    Agreement with tolerance in the order of district towns in the results of SD-TOPSIS application in space ‐ combination A vs. D2.

    Agreement with tolerance in the order of district towns in the results of SD-TOPSIS application in space ‐ combination A vs. D2. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  8. 888
    Agreement in the order of district towns in the results of the SD-TOPSIS application in space ‐ combination A vs. D2.

    Agreement in the order of district towns in the results of the SD-TOPSIS application in space ‐ combination A vs. D2. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  9. 889
    A set of 4 criteria for the needs of multi-criteria evaluation ‐ combinations B1– B5.

    A set of 4 criteria for the needs of multi-criteria evaluation ‐ combinations B1– B5. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  10. 890
    Territorial-administrative division of the Slovak Republic (districts).

    Territorial-administrative division of the Slovak Republic (districts). by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  11. 891
    Results of SD-TOPSIS application ‐ combinations D1-D10.

    Results of SD-TOPSIS application ‐ combinations D1-D10. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  12. 892
    Results of correlation analysis using Kendall’s rank correlation coefficient.

    Results of correlation analysis using Kendall’s rank correlation coefficient. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  13. 893
    A set of 3 criteria for the needs of multi-criteria evaluation ‐ combinations C1–C10.

    A set of 3 criteria for the needs of multi-criteria evaluation ‐ combinations C1–C10. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  14. 894
    Comparison of agreement in the order based on the SD-TOPSIS technique across groups of combinations - B1-B5 vs. C1-C10 vs. D1-D10.

    Comparison of agreement in the order based on the SD-TOPSIS technique across groups of combinations - B1-B5 vs. C1-C10 vs. D1-D10. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  15. 895
    The principle of operation of the TOPSIS technique.

    The principle of operation of the TOPSIS technique. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  16. 896
    Lower quartile of district towns evaluated by the SD-TOPSIS technique ‐ combination of A, B1, B1 and C1.

    Lower quartile of district towns evaluated by the SD-TOPSIS technique ‐ combination of A, B1, B1 and C1. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  17. 897
    Agreement with tolerance in the order of district towns in the results of SD-TOPSIS application in space ‐ combination A vs. C1.

    Agreement with tolerance in the order of district towns in the results of SD-TOPSIS application in space ‐ combination A vs. C1. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  18. 898
    The importance of entry criteria from the point of view of the SD method ‐ combinations B1 –B5.

    The importance of entry criteria from the point of view of the SD method ‐ combinations B1 –B5. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  19. 899
    Comparison of rank correlation analysis results across groups of combinations - B1-B5 vs. C1-C10 vs. D1-D10.

    Comparison of rank correlation analysis results across groups of combinations - B1-B5 vs. C1-C10 vs. D1-D10. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  20. 900
    Comparison of the selected multi-criteria methods.

    Comparison of the selected multi-criteria methods. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:

Search Tools: