Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant based » significant barrier (Expand Search), significant burden (Expand Search), significant causal (Expand Search)
significant cause » significant change (Expand Search), significant changes (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search)
Showing 1,621 - 1,640 results of 21,342 for search '(( ((significant based) OR (significant cause)) decrease ) OR ( significant decrease decrease ))', query time: 0.63s Refine Results
  1. 1621
    Group error analysis of bulk formation density for the proposed GPR and some previous approaches.

    Group error analysis of bulk formation density for the proposed GPR and some previous approaches. by Fahd Saeed Alakbari (10701871)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  2. 1622
    Trend analysis of the ν<sub>s</sub> – DTs in the range found in the dataset used for the optimized GPR.

    Trend analysis of the ν<sub>s</sub> – DTs in the range found in the dataset used for the optimized GPR. by Fahd Saeed Alakbari (10701871)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  3. 1623
    The optimized GPR approach’s error histogram of the training dataset.

    The optimized GPR approach’s error histogram of the training dataset. by Fahd Saeed Alakbari (10701871)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  4. 1624
    The optimized GPR approach’s errors histogram of the testing dataset.

    The optimized GPR approach’s errors histogram of the testing dataset. by Fahd Saeed Alakbari (10701871)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  5. 1625
    Group error analysis of shear time for the proposed GPR and some previous approaches.

    Group error analysis of shear time for the proposed GPR and some previous approaches. by Fahd Saeed Alakbari (10701871)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  6. 1626
    The comparison of ν<sub>s</sub> – DTc trends models with experimental measured values for RHOB = 2.27 g/cc and DTs =  248.99 us/ft.

    The comparison of ν<sub>s</sub> – DTc trends models with experimental measured values for RHOB = 2.27 g/cc and DTs =  248.99 us/ft. by Fahd Saeed Alakbari (10701871)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  7. 1627
    The optimized parameters of the proposed GPR method.

    The optimized parameters of the proposed GPR method. by Fahd Saeed Alakbari (10701871)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  8. 1628
    The optimized GPR approach’s error histogram of the validation dataset.

    The optimized GPR approach’s error histogram of the validation dataset. by Fahd Saeed Alakbari (10701871)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  9. 1629
    Cross-plots of (a) the proposed GPR, Ranjbar-Karaml et al. [14], Christaras et al. [52], Feng et al. [16], Gowida et al. [17] models and (b) Khandelwal et al. [13], Brandås et al. [15], and Kumar et al. [

    Cross-plots of (a) the proposed GPR, Ranjbar-Karaml et al. [14], Christaras et al. [52], Feng et al. [16], Gowida et al. [17] models and (b) Khandelwal et al. [13], Brandås et al.... by Fahd Saeed Alakbari (10701871)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  10. 1630
    Group error analysis of compressional time for the proposed GPR and some previous approaches.

    Group error analysis of compressional time for the proposed GPR and some previous approaches. by Fahd Saeed Alakbari (10701871)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  11. 1631
    The optimized GPR approach’s cross-plotting for the validation dataset.

    The optimized GPR approach’s cross-plotting for the validation dataset. by Fahd Saeed Alakbari (10701871)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  12. 1632
    (a) Average absolute percentage relative error (AAPRE), and, (b) Coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) of the models.

    (a) Average absolute percentage relative error (AAPRE), and, (b) Coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) of the models. by Fahd Saeed Alakbari (10701871)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  13. 1633
    Trend analysis of the ν<sub>s</sub> – RHOB in the range of data found in the dataset used for the optimized GPR.

    Trend analysis of the ν<sub>s</sub> – RHOB in the range of data found in the dataset used for the optimized GPR. by Fahd Saeed Alakbari (10701871)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  14. 1634
    The comparison of ν<sub>s</sub> – DTc trends models with experimental measured values for RHOB = 2.02 g/cc and DTs =  265.03 us/ft.

    The comparison of ν<sub>s</sub> – DTc trends models with experimental measured values for RHOB = 2.02 g/cc and DTs =  265.03 us/ft. by Fahd Saeed Alakbari (10701871)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  15. 1635
    (a) Taylor diagrams of Khandelwal et al. [13], Brabdas et al, Kumar et al. [12] models. (b) Taylor diagrams of Ranjbar-Karami et al. [14], Christaras et al. [52], Feng et al. [16], Gowida et al. [17], and the proposed GPR models.

    (a) Taylor diagrams of Khandelwal et al. [13], Brabdas et al, Kumar et al. [12] models. (b) Taylor diagrams of Ranjbar-Karami et al. [14], Christaras et al. [52], Feng et al. [16],... by Fahd Saeed Alakbari (10701871)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  16. 1636
    (a, b). The statistical error analyses for the models using the same dataset.

    (a, b). The statistical error analyses for the models using the same dataset. by Fahd Saeed Alakbari (10701871)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  17. 1637
    The comparison of ν<sub>s</sub> – RHOB trends models with experimental measurements.

    The comparison of ν<sub>s</sub> – RHOB trends models with experimental measurements. by Fahd Saeed Alakbari (10701871)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  18. 1638
    The comparison of ν<sub>s</sub> – DTs trends models with experimental measured values for RHOB = 2.33 g/cc and DTc = 118.67 us/ft.

    The comparison of ν<sub>s</sub> – DTs trends models with experimental measured values for RHOB = 2.33 g/cc and DTc = 118.67 us/ft. by Fahd Saeed Alakbari (10701871)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  19. 1639
    The optimized GPR approach’s cross-plotting for the training dataset.

    The optimized GPR approach’s cross-plotting for the training dataset. by Fahd Saeed Alakbari (10701871)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  20. 1640
    Methodology flowchart.

    Methodology flowchart. by Fahd Saeed Alakbari (10701871)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:

Search Tools: