Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant time » significant threat (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search)
time decrease » time increased (Expand Search), sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant time » significant threat (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search)
time decrease » time increased (Expand Search), sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
-
2221
-
2222
Effect of 1.25% of SCFP on MDR <i>Salmonella</i> serovars reduction at 24h.
Published 2025Subjects: -
2223
-
2224
-
2225
-
2226
Summary of significance levels for comparison of surgical segment ROM between different test groups.
Published 2025Subjects: -
2227
-
2228
Volitional control frequency and intensity in VH (Kapsner-Smith et al., 2025)
Published 2025“…</p><p dir="ltr"><b>Method: </b>Twenty-six people with HVDs and 26 matched controls participated in tasks to assess the smallest volitional increases and decreases they could make in vocal <i>F</i>0 and intensity. …”
-
2229
Analysis of the Nugent score before (T=0) and after (T=1) the use of the vaginal gel. Number of participants and respective percentages of Nugent scores before and after the intervention. A statistically significant decrease in Nugent scores was observed after the intervention (p value =0.0047).
Published 2025“…Number of participants and respective percentages of Nugent scores before and after the intervention. A statistically significant decrease in Nugent scores was observed after the intervention (p value =0.0047).…”
-
2230
-
2231
-
2232
-
2233
-
2234
-
2235
-
2236
-
2237
-
2238
The relationship between residual shear strength and <i>JRC</i>, normal stress.
Published 2024Subjects: -
2239
OKIO 3D scanner, 3D views of the fracture surfaces and selection of section line.
Published 2024Subjects: -
2240