Table 1_Seasonal variations in biomass, height, photosynthetic efficiency, and carbon and nitrogen contents of Suaeda japonica in Incheon salt marshes (Korea).pdf by Jeong Hwa Hwang (20858750)

“…In addition, photosynthetic efficiency at SR decreased significantly in summer compared to spring. …”

Data Sheet 1_CD46 TREM1 regulates the autophagy marker LC3B ATG5 in oral squamous cell carcinoma.docx by Xiaodan Liu (849235)

“…</p>Results<p>In vitro cell experiments showed that CD46 and TREM1 were highly expressed on the surface of OSCC cells, while the expression of LC3B and ATG5 was significantly decreased. Compared with the control group (SC-shRNA), the CD46 shRNA group could effectively reduce the expression of CD46 in OSCC cells and increase the expression of autophagy and apoptosis protein (P<0.01). …”

Table 1_TCF3 downregulation alleviates renal fibrosis via PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway inhibition and autophagy restoration in diabetic nephropathy.docx by Chen-xiao Liu (22750118)

“…Both the DN rat model and HG-stimulated HK-2 cells exhibited enhanced EMT markers, with significantly increased α-SMA and vimentin expression (p < 0.001), and decreased E-cadherin levels (p < 0.001). …”

A Locally Linear Dynamic Strategy for Manifold Learning. by Weifan Wang (4669081)

“…In contrast to alignment modulation, the change in the spectrum is largely non-selective. exhibits no significant change for both signal-oriented (blue) and noise-oriented (orange) modes. …”

Serum calcium levels corrected for albumin. by Naoki Suzuki (308620)

“…Lanthanum carbonate prescriptions decreased significantly in the tenapanor group and were largely replaced by low-dose tenapanor.…”

The proportion of the dosage of tenapanor. by Naoki Suzuki (308620)

“…Lanthanum carbonate prescriptions decreased significantly in the tenapanor group and were largely replaced by low-dose tenapanor.…”

Fig 9 - by David G. Morgan (1459003)

“…The trendlines for unadjusted data are logarithmic and steeply decreasing, while those for the adjusted data are approximately linear and flat (with gradients not significantly different to zero), showing that adjustment by <i>J</i> can compensate for the effect of relative movement.…”

Scatterplot 8. by Chao Yang (174810)

“…When the HAR was lower than 0.13, mortality within 28 days after ICU admission decreased significantly as the HAR increased. When the HAR was higher than 0.13, the HAR was not a protective factor for mortality within 28 days after ICU admission. …”

Scatterplot 5. by Chao Yang (174810)

“…When the HAR was lower than 0.13, mortality within 28 days after ICU admission decreased significantly as the HAR increased. When the HAR was higher than 0.13, the HAR was not a protective factor for mortality within 28 days after ICU admission. …”

Scatterplot 9. by Chao Yang (174810)

“…When the HAR was lower than 0.13, mortality within 28 days after ICU admission decreased significantly as the HAR increased. When the HAR was higher than 0.13, the HAR was not a protective factor for mortality within 28 days after ICU admission. …”

Scatterplot 1. by Chao Yang (174810)

“…When the HAR was lower than 0.13, mortality within 28 days after ICU admission decreased significantly as the HAR increased. When the HAR was higher than 0.13, the HAR was not a protective factor for mortality within 28 days after ICU admission. …”

Scatterplot 6. by Chao Yang (174810)

“…When the HAR was lower than 0.13, mortality within 28 days after ICU admission decreased significantly as the HAR increased. When the HAR was higher than 0.13, the HAR was not a protective factor for mortality within 28 days after ICU admission. …”

Scatterplot 2. by Chao Yang (174810)

“…When the HAR was lower than 0.13, mortality within 28 days after ICU admission decreased significantly as the HAR increased. When the HAR was higher than 0.13, the HAR was not a protective factor for mortality within 28 days after ICU admission. …”

Raw data of this study. by Chao Yang (174810)

“…When the HAR was lower than 0.13, mortality within 28 days after ICU admission decreased significantly as the HAR increased. When the HAR was higher than 0.13, the HAR was not a protective factor for mortality within 28 days after ICU admission. …”

Scatterplot 4. by Chao Yang (174810)

“…When the HAR was lower than 0.13, mortality within 28 days after ICU admission decreased significantly as the HAR increased. When the HAR was higher than 0.13, the HAR was not a protective factor for mortality within 28 days after ICU admission. …”

Scatterplot 3. by Chao Yang (174810)

“…When the HAR was lower than 0.13, mortality within 28 days after ICU admission decreased significantly as the HAR increased. When the HAR was higher than 0.13, the HAR was not a protective factor for mortality within 28 days after ICU admission. …”

Correlation matrix. by Chao Yang (174810)

“…When the HAR was lower than 0.13, mortality within 28 days after ICU admission decreased significantly as the HAR increased. When the HAR was higher than 0.13, the HAR was not a protective factor for mortality within 28 days after ICU admission. …”

Scatterplot 7. by Chao Yang (174810)

“…When the HAR was lower than 0.13, mortality within 28 days after ICU admission decreased significantly as the HAR increased. When the HAR was higher than 0.13, the HAR was not a protective factor for mortality within 28 days after ICU admission. …”

Supplementary Material for: Pre- and post-operative Exercise and Nutrition Therapy in Patients with Esophageal Cancer Undergoing Esophagectomy: A Prospective Interventional Study by figshare admin karger (2628495)

“…Results: Thirty-six patients underwent intervention and esophagectomy (intervention completion rate: 94.4%, no serious adverse events). The SMM increased by 4.9% for T1–T2 (p < 0.001) but decreased by 10.1% for T1–T3 (p < 0.001), suggesting that the primary outcome was not achieved. …”

Supplementary Material for: Impact of Liraglutide 3.0 mg on Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease in Individuals with Obesity: A Real-World Study by figshare admin karger (2628495)

“…Hepatic steatosis index (HSI) and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) liver fat score also decreased significantly (HSI: 44.7 ± 6.2 to 42.2 ± 5.8 p<0.001; NAFLD liver fat score: 2.12 ± 2.90 to 0.43 ± 1.91, p<0.001). …”