Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant species » significant declines (Expand Search), significant spatial (Expand Search), significant genes (Expand Search)
significant factor » significant factors (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant species » significant declines (Expand Search), significant spatial (Expand Search), significant genes (Expand Search)
significant factor » significant factors (Expand Search)
-
2001
Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.
Published 2024“…<p>Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”
-
2002
-
2003
-
2004
-
2005
-
2006
-
2007
<i>RR</i> of the spatio-temporal interaction effect for Human Rabies in China from 2004–2020.
Published 2024Subjects: -
2008
-
2009
Annual average incidence rates of human rabies in provinces from 2004–2020.
Published 2024Subjects: -
2010
-
2011
-
2012
-
2013
Evaluation of the fitting performance of spatio-temporal interaction models.
Published 2024Subjects: -
2014
-
2015
-
2016
-
2017
-
2018
-
2019
Pan-cancer analyses of ACADM expression and its prognostic significance in the TCGA database.
Published 2025Subjects: -
2020
Increased <i>Huwe1</i> after induction of Sox2 in mouse ES cells.
Published 2025“…<i>Atoh1</i> expression increased with <i>Sox2</i> at low levels but decreased at higher <i>Sox2</i> level. The relative expression of each gene increased significantly (*p < 0.05) compared to untreated controls (no Dox). …”