Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant gender » significant concern (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant gender » significant concern (Expand Search)
-
2901
-
2902
-
2903
Changes of exchangeable calcium carbonate content during acification of black soil.
Published 2025Subjects: -
2904
-
2905
-
2906
-
2907
-
2908
-
2909
-
2910
Characterization and difference in various variables with different PA level.
Published 2025Subjects: -
2911
-
2912
-
2913
-
2914
-
2915
Comparison of the fit of multiple cluster analyses of the cross-lagged panel model.
Published 2025Subjects: -
2916
Preference for the EIA – conjoint results.
Published 2025“…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
-
2917
Marginal means – Pooled across scenarios.
Published 2025“…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
-
2918
Sample attribute table.
Published 2025“…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
-
2919
Subgroup analysis – Political affiliation.
Published 2025“…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
-
2920
Sample scenario description.
Published 2025“…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”