Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant non » significant gap (Expand Search), significant amount (Expand Search)
significant nn » significant ns (Expand Search), significant new (Expand Search), significant dna (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant non » significant gap (Expand Search), significant amount (Expand Search)
significant nn » significant ns (Expand Search), significant new (Expand Search), significant dna (Expand Search)
-
2281
-
2282
qRT-PCR results of differentially expressed miRNAs in rats’ myocardial tissue after training.
Published 2025Subjects: -
2283
-
2284
-
2285
Differential expression of miRNAs in SHR-SED group and BFRT group (all miRNAs).
Published 2025Subjects: -
2286
Histogram of the GO functional enrichment of differential miRNA target genes.
Published 2025Subjects: -
2287
-
2288
Changes in SHR body weight, hemodynamics and cardiac function before and after training.
Published 2025Subjects: -
2289
-
2290
-
2291
-
2292
-
2293
-
2294
-
2295
-
2296
-
2297
-
2298
-
2299
Flow chart of the literature search.
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
2300
Funnel plot for scar thickness.
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”