Autophagy significantly increases RGCs loss. حسب Hongmei Qian (538647)

الموضوعات:

Variation of the most appropriate p value significance threshold with different ratios of the standard deviations and sample sizes. حسب Farrokh Habibzadeh (12256529)

الموضوعات:

Summary of significance levels for comparison of surgical segment ROM between different test groups. حسب Jia Zhu (135506)

الموضوعات:

Analysis of the Nugent score before (T=0) and after (T=1) the use of the vaginal gel. Number of participants and respective percentages of Nugent scores before and after the intervention. A statistically significant decrease in Nugent scores was observed after the intervention (p value =0.0047). حسب Adriana Bittencourt Campaner (21175462)

"…Number of participants and respective percentages of Nugent scores before and after the intervention. A statistically significant decrease in Nugent scores was observed after the intervention (p value =0.0047).…"

Descriptive statistics of alcohol consumption in G7 countries (in litres/capita). حسب Luis Alberiko Gil-Alana (14659817)

الموضوعات:

Data for the G7 countries in 2022. حسب Luis Alberiko Gil-Alana (14659817)

الموضوعات:

Estimates of the differencing parameter, d, in Eq (1). حسب Luis Alberiko Gil-Alana (14659817)

الموضوعات:

Estimates of the differencing parameter, d, in Eq (1). حسب Luis Alberiko Gil-Alana (14659817)

الموضوعات:

Time series plots: Alcohol consumption. حسب Luis Alberiko Gil-Alana (14659817)

الموضوعات:

Estimated coefficients based on the selected model in Table 4. حسب Luis Alberiko Gil-Alana (14659817)

الموضوعات:

Estimated coefficients based on the selected model in Table 3. حسب Luis Alberiko Gil-Alana (14659817)

الموضوعات:

The variables that significantly predicted litter clump weight in shelter cats. حسب Allison Andrukonis (11846404)

Preference for the EIA – conjoint results. حسب Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

"…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"

Marginal means – Pooled across scenarios. حسب Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

"…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"

Sample attribute table. حسب Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

"…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"

Subgroup analysis – Political affiliation. حسب Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

"…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"

Sample scenario description. حسب Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

"…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"

AMCEs – Pooled across scenarios. حسب Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

"…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"

Methodological flowchart. حسب Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

"…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"

Preference for the EIA vs. ETA across scenarios. حسب Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

"…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"