Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significantly less » significantly lower (Expand Search), significantly reduce (Expand Search), significantly better (Expand Search)
significantly i » significantly _ (Expand Search), significantly high (Expand Search), significantly vary (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significantly less » significantly lower (Expand Search), significantly reduce (Expand Search), significantly better (Expand Search)
significantly i » significantly _ (Expand Search), significantly high (Expand Search), significantly vary (Expand Search)
-
221
-
222
-
223
-
224
-
225
-
226
-
227
Comparison of questionnaire scores among genotypes for the significant associations.
Published 2025Subjects: -
228
-
229
-
230
-
231
-
232
-
233
Analysis of the Nugent score before (T=0) and after (T=1) the use of the vaginal gel. Number of participants and respective percentages of Nugent scores before and after the intervention. A statistically significant decrease in Nugent scores was observed after the intervention (p value =0.0047).
Published 2025“…A statistically significant decrease in Nugent scores was observed after the intervention (p value =0.0047).…”
-
234
-
235
-
236
-
237
-
238
-
239
-
240
Sound stress exposure prolonged the period of decreased withdrawal threshold after complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA) injection.
Published 2025“…(B) 50% withdrawal threshold in CFA-treated mice exposed to sound stress. They showed a significant decrease in 50% withdrawal threshold on day 7 after CFA injection, and CFA-treated mice exposed to sound stress showed a significant decrease in 50% withdrawal threshold during days 7–21 after CFA injection (CFA, on day 7, ****<i>P</i> < 0.001 vs day 0, on day 10, ***<i>P</i> < 0.001 vs day0; CFA + stress, day 7, 10, 14, and 21, ****<i>P</i> < 0.0001 vs day 0, Dunnett’s test). …”