Search alternatives:
ng decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
0 decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search)
ng decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
0 decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search)
-
441
-
442
-
443
-
444
-
445
-
446
-
447
-
448
-
449
Average % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for brown non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.
Published 2024“…<p>Average % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for brown non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”
-
450
Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.
Published 2024“…<p>Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”
-
451
Experimental results on Baboon; (a) Original image; (b) Baboon image corrupted with multiplicative noise with <i>σ</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.1; (c) Obtained image by optimal value of <i>dt</i> = 0.0002; (d) Obtained image by decreased <i>dt</i> = 0.00002; (e) Obtained image by increased <i>dt</i> = 0.002; (f) Obtained image by increased <i>dt</i> = 0.02.
Published 2018“…<p>Experimental results on Baboon; (a) Original image; (b) Baboon image corrupted with multiplicative noise with <i>σ</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.1; (c) Obtained image by optimal value of <i>dt</i> = 0.0002; (d) Obtained image by decreased <i>dt</i> = 0.00002; (e) Obtained image by increased <i>dt</i> = 0.002; (f) Obtained image by increased <i>dt</i> = 0.02.…”
-
452
Weight and Body Mass Index (BMI) of 10 male healthy volunteers (mean±SE) significantly decreased during week-by-week comparisons period (ANOVA for repeated measures, p<0.001 and p=0.002, respectively).
Published 2013“…<p>Weight and Body Mass Index (BMI) of 10 male healthy volunteers (mean±SE) significantly decreased during week-by-week comparisons period (ANOVA for repeated measures, p<0.001 and p=0.002, respectively).…”
-
453
-
454
ARL comparison among CUSUM charts for monitoring decreases in standard deviation (<i>n</i> = 5, ARL<sub>0</sub> = 500, <i>σ</i><sub><i>opt</i></sub> = 0.7).
Published 2015“…<p>ARL comparison among CUSUM charts for monitoring decreases in standard deviation (<i>n</i> = 5, ARL<sub>0</sub> = 500, <i>σ</i><sub><i>opt</i></sub> = 0.7).…”
-
455
-
456
-
457
-
458
-
459
-
460