Search alternatives:
ng decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
0 decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
ng decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
0 decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
101
Performance of selected drugs against field isolates during the study period.
Published 2024Subjects: -
102
<i>In vitro</i> susceptibility responses of field isolates to antimalarials during the study period.
Published 2024Subjects: -
103
-
104
Frequency of SNPs in <i>Pfmrp1</i> gene in field isolates during the study period.
Published 2024Subjects: -
105
-
106
-
107
-
108
-
109
-
110
-
111
-
112
-
113
-
114
Alternative bounded and monotonically decreasing functions do not accurately fit the bias in the naïve SI.
Published 2022“…Data were averaged across N = 9 mice. ***p < 0.001.</p> <p>(TIF)</p>…”
-
115
-
116
-
117
Exposure to low CO<sub>2</sub> levels decreases ER cholesterol levels.
Published 2023“…<b>(B)</b> Bioluminescence recordings from the different conditions as depicted in <b>(A)</b>, the arrow indicates the time CO<sub>2</sub> was shifted from 5% to 1% (mean ± SE, <i>n</i> = 4 biological replicates per condition, AUC for 0 mM 0.34 ± 0.007, 1.59 ± 0.004 (<i>P</i> < 0.0001), 0.5 mM 1.00 ± 0.023, 2.68 ± 0.04 (<i>P</i> < 0.0001), 1 mM 1.66 ± 0.07, 3.34 ± 0.04 (<i>P</i> < 0.0001), 3 mM 2.06 ± 0.02, 2.79 ± 0.07 (<i>P</i> < 0.0001), 5 mM 2.02 ± 0.05, 2.43 ± 0.06 (<i>P</i> < 0.002), 7 mM 1.85 ± 0.01, 1.77 ± 0.02 (<i>P</i> < 0.02) two-sided Student’s <i>t</i> test). …”
-
118
-
119
-
120