Showing 61 - 80 results of 224,757 for search '(( 0 a decrease ) OR ( 50 ((((ng decrease) OR (we decrease))) OR (mean decrease)) ))', query time: 1.58s Refine Results
  1. 61
  2. 62
  3. 63
  4. 64
  5. 65
  6. 66
  7. 67
  8. 68
  9. 69

    Nasal mucociliary clearance was decreased in <i>Ttll1</i><sup>−/−</sup> mice. by Toshiyuki Iwata (419270)

    Published 2015
    “…The area occupied by contrast material is bordered with a red line. (D) We calculated the percent changes in the area of contrast material [(area at 30 min − area at 150 min)/area at 30 min] to assess clearance of contrast material (mean ± SEM, n = 4, *P < 0.005 by two-tailed Student's t test). …”
  10. 70

    nLTD decreases the molecular proximity between endogenous spine cofilin and F-actin by Barbara Calabrese (553229)

    Published 2014
    “…Data are expressed as mean ± SEM of the “% FRET” values determined using the Zeiss LSM 510 software module for FRET acceptor photobleaching (see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0094787#s2" target="_blank">Methods</a>); *p<0.05, **p<0.01 compared to control alone; <sup>#</sup>p<0.05 compared to nLTD alone; <sup>XX</sup>p<0.01 compared to CIN alone, two-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni post hoc test., (number of spines: ctrl = 43, nLTD = 29, CIN = 49, CIN+nLTD = 77). …”
  11. 71
  12. 72
  13. 73
  14. 74
  15. 75
  16. 76
  17. 77

    Datasheet1_Impact of lockdown on children with type-1 diabetes: returning to the community was associated with a decrease in HbA1c.pdf by Benjamin Morat (17677977)

    Published 2023
    “…No significant difference was observed between medians of HbA1c_mean and HbA1c_after values (8.37% [7.88; 9.32%] vs. 8.50% [7.70; 9.50%], respectively; p = 0.391). …”
  18. 78

    Datasheet2_Impact of lockdown on children with type-1 diabetes: returning to the community was associated with a decrease in HbA1c.pdf by Benjamin Morat (17677977)

    Published 2023
    “…No significant difference was observed between medians of HbA1c_mean and HbA1c_after values (8.37% [7.88; 9.32%] vs. 8.50% [7.70; 9.50%], respectively; p = 0.391). …”
  19. 79
  20. 80