Computational results showing how tissue softening influences thinning and dilation. by Kun Gou (10900149)

“…<p><i>g</i>_<i>r</i> = 0.1, <i>g</i>_<i>θ</i> = 2, and <i>g</i>_<i>z</i> = 1. …”

Comparison of the molecular characteristics of <i>Mycoplasma pneumoniae</i> from children across different regions of China by Guanhua Xue (416769)

“…Type I was the most prevalent genotype in five locations, except Nanjing where type II was the most common type (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Five distinct MLVA types were identified in the 172 samples. …”

DataSheet_1_Clinical and Immunological Characteristics of Patients With Adenovirus Infection at Different Altitude Areas in Tibet, China.docx by Bowen Wang (526637)

“…Referring to the environmental factors regression analysis, altitude and relative humidity were tightly associated with the number of infected patients (P < 0.01). A higher incidence rate of general pneumonia (45.7%) or severe pneumonia (8.0%) occurred in the ultra-high-altitude group (P < 0.05). …”

Elimination of mesenchymal Wnt signaling impairs pancreas formation. by Limor Landsman (206879)

“…<i>p</i> values: *<i>p</i><0.05, **<i>p</i><0.01, ***<i>p</i><0.005.</p>…”

Image1_Defining levels of care in cardiogenic shock.tiff by Miguel Alvarez Villela (17306389)

“…L-2: 10%; p < 0.001). Despite increasing in-hospital mortality with decreasing LOC, no significant difference was seen after multivariable adjustment.…”

Image2_Defining levels of care in cardiogenic shock.tiff by Miguel Alvarez Villela (17306389)

“…L-2: 10%; p < 0.001). Despite increasing in-hospital mortality with decreasing LOC, no significant difference was seen after multivariable adjustment.…”

Image3_Defining levels of care in cardiogenic shock.tiff by Miguel Alvarez Villela (17306389)

“…L-2: 10%; p < 0.001). Despite increasing in-hospital mortality with decreasing LOC, no significant difference was seen after multivariable adjustment.…”

Datasheet1_Defining levels of care in cardiogenic shock.pdf by Miguel Alvarez Villela (17306389)

“…L-2: 10%; p < 0.001). Despite increasing in-hospital mortality with decreasing LOC, no significant difference was seen after multivariable adjustment.…”

Table 1_Glucose and lipid metabolism in non-diabetic, non-obese patients with obstructive sleep apnea: sex differences.docx by Yuhan Wang (595964)

“…In contrast, among men, OSA severity showed independent associations with triglycerides (15 ≤ AHI < 30: β = 1.00, 95% CI 0.05 to 1.95) and HDL-C (AHI ≥ 15: β = −0.17, 95% CI -0.33 to −0.01; AHI ≥ 30: β = −0.22, 95% CI -0.38 to −0.06).…”

Sound evoked cortical activity across vigilance states before and after NOE. by Linus Milinski (10532121)

“…Asterisks for panels <b>E-F</b> represent statistical significance p values *<0.05, **<0.01, ***<0.001 (GLMM). Each panel depicts one ferret. …”

Photomicrographs illustrating neuronal cell loss in the CA1 hippocampal region after <i>status epilepticus</i> (SE), in pilocarpine-treated rats. by Chiara Lucchi (451435)

“…^# = <i>P</i><0.05, ^## = <i>P</i><0.01 vs the control non-epileptic group, Fisher's LSD test. …”

Assay of plasma homocysteine level. by Yu Dong (398252)

“…**<i>P<</i>0.01 versus Control; ^#<i>P<</i>0.05 versus HHcy. …”

Effect of purified truncated p37 on gene expression. by Amber Cathie Gomersall (819803)

“…Significant differences between treated and untreated fibroblasts were calculated using ANOVA analysis (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001).</p>…”

Symptom scores and heart rate changes of patients with POTS after metoprolol treatment. by Jing Lin (50818)

“…<p>Compared to the symptom scores before treatment, the scores were significantly decreased after treatment in 34 children with POTS [(5.7 ± 2.2) vs. (2.9 ± 2.5), <i>t</i> = 9.232, <i>P</i> <0.001)]. …”

Supplementary Material for: Determination of Cytokines and Oxidative Stress Biomarkers in Cognitive Impairment Induced by Methylmalonic Acidemia by Li Q. (2850350)

“…<b><i>Results:</i></b> Compared to control group, the serum levels of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-6, malondialdehyde (MDA), and nitric oxide (NO) in the MMA patients increased markedly (<i>p</i> < 0.05); glutathione (GSH) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) decreased obviously (<i>p</i> < 0.01). …”

Table_1_Macromineral requirements for maintenance and growth in male and female hair sheep.docx by Caio J. L. Herbster (14703109)

“…The chosen models explained the observed variability in the sex, and the choices were based on a low level of uncertainty (w ≥ 0.90). Irrespective of sex, NCa_g and NP_g decreased with increasing BW from 10 to 30 kg and average daily gain (ADG) of 150 g/day, ranging from 1.71–1.38; 1.83–1.57; 1.82–1.51 of Ca and 0.86–0.66; 0.92–0.78; 0.92–0.75 of P for non-castrated males, castrated males, and females, respectively. …”

Sfrp5 increases glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in the rat pancreatic beta cell line INS-1E by Maren Carstensen-Kirberg (726961)

“…We incubated rat INS-1E cells with 0.1, 1 or 5 μg/ml recombinant Sfrp5 for 24h. We measured basal and glucose-stimulated insulin secretion at glucose concentrations of 2.5 and 20 mmol/l. …”

DataSheet_1_Methionine and Tryptophan Play Different Modulatory Roles in the European Seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax) Innate Immune Response and Apoptosis Signaling—An In Vitro Stud... by Marina Machado (4996619)

“…Medium L-15 10% FBS without AA addition (0.5mM of L-methionine, 0.1 mM of L-tryptophan) was used as control. …”

Differentially Expressed Gene Transcripts Using RNA Sequencing from the Blood of Immunosuppressed Kidney Allograft Recipients by Casey Dorr (735702)

“…Principal components (PCs) were computed using a surrogate variable approach. DEGs post-transplant were identified by controlling false discovery rate (FDR) at < 0.01 with at least a 2 fold change in expression from pre-transplant. …”

SMARCAL1 ubiquitylation regulates its activity at replication forks in vivo. by Maïlyn Yates (18182336)

“…Box and whisker diagram of γ-H2A.X/FLAG-intensity in FLAG+ cells nuclei. Error bars represent 5–95 percentile from 3 independent experiments; 5,072 cells were quantified and samples were compared with Kruskal–Wallis’ test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparisons. (*) <i>P</i> < 0.05, (**) <i>P</i> < 0.01, (***) <i>P</i> < 0.001, (****) <i>P</i> < 0.0001. …”