Showing 62,821 - 62,840 results of 69,884 for search '(( 01 ((0 decrease) OR (a decrease)) ) OR ( 50 ((we decrease) OR (nn decrease)) ))', query time: 1.31s Refine Results
  1. 62821

    PTH promotes the repair of SAON after CD surgery in the bone tunnel and bone marrow of each group. by Chen-he Zhou (4057408)

    Published 2017
    “…(B) in the coronal plane of distal femur with a bone tunnel (yellow dotted circles). (C) The percentage of the area of necrosis foci and the percentage of empty osteocyte lacuna were measured, n = 6 in the SAON-CD-PTH group, n = 6 in the SAON-CD group, and n = 4 in the sham-CD group, Data are presented as mean ± SD, and error bars in the figure denote SD, *p<0.05, **p<0.01 (H&E, 50x and 200x).…”
  2. 62822

    Cerivastatin inhibits YAP nuclear localization induced by stimulation with neurotensin and insulin in confluent PDAC cells. by Fang Hao (535483)

    Published 2019
    “…Cerivastatin significantly decreased NT+Ins nuclear localization of YAP as compared with untreated controls (**P < 0.01) as shown by t-test.…”
  3. 62823

    UBC9 knockdown influences the expression of multiple downstream genes. by Sufen Fang (3878713)

    Published 2017
    “…(B) Graph of the relative ratios of the P-p65, p65, P-IκBα and IκBα proteins to β-actin in each group. *P < 0.01 and <sup><b>#</b></sup>P <0.05 compared with NC shRNA group, n = 4.…”
  4. 62824

    Blood cell deconvolution of transcriptomic data from states of infection with <i>L</i>. <i>infantum</i>. by Luiz Gustavo Gardinassi (3340488)

    Published 2016
    “…Expression values were scaled and displayed as a Z-score, whereby blue indicates decreased expression and red indicates increased expression. …”
  5. 62825

    DataSheet_1_Dynamics of Type I and Type II Interferon Signature Determines Responsiveness to Anti-TNF Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis.xlsx by Takeshi Iwasaki (3279906)

    Published 2022
    “…The expression of type I IFN signaling-related genes was higher in non-responders than in responders before and after treatment (P = 0.03, 0.005, respectively). The expression of type II IFN signaling-related genes did not significantly differ before treatment; however, it increased in non-responders and decreased in responders, with a significant difference being observed after three months of treatment (P = 1.2×10<sup>-3</sup>). …”
  6. 62826

    Image_1_Dynamics of Type I and Type II Interferon Signature Determines Responsiveness to Anti-TNF Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis.jpeg by Takeshi Iwasaki (3279906)

    Published 2022
    “…The expression of type I IFN signaling-related genes was higher in non-responders than in responders before and after treatment (P = 0.03, 0.005, respectively). The expression of type II IFN signaling-related genes did not significantly differ before treatment; however, it increased in non-responders and decreased in responders, with a significant difference being observed after three months of treatment (P = 1.2×10<sup>-3</sup>). …”
  7. 62827

    Image_2_Dynamics of Type I and Type II Interferon Signature Determines Responsiveness to Anti-TNF Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis.jpeg by Takeshi Iwasaki (3279906)

    Published 2022
    “…The expression of type I IFN signaling-related genes was higher in non-responders than in responders before and after treatment (P = 0.03, 0.005, respectively). The expression of type II IFN signaling-related genes did not significantly differ before treatment; however, it increased in non-responders and decreased in responders, with a significant difference being observed after three months of treatment (P = 1.2×10<sup>-3</sup>). …”
  8. 62828

    Image_5_Dynamics of Type I and Type II Interferon Signature Determines Responsiveness to Anti-TNF Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis.jpeg by Takeshi Iwasaki (3279906)

    Published 2022
    “…The expression of type I IFN signaling-related genes was higher in non-responders than in responders before and after treatment (P = 0.03, 0.005, respectively). The expression of type II IFN signaling-related genes did not significantly differ before treatment; however, it increased in non-responders and decreased in responders, with a significant difference being observed after three months of treatment (P = 1.2×10<sup>-3</sup>). …”
  9. 62829

    Image_3_Dynamics of Type I and Type II Interferon Signature Determines Responsiveness to Anti-TNF Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis.jpeg by Takeshi Iwasaki (3279906)

    Published 2022
    “…The expression of type I IFN signaling-related genes was higher in non-responders than in responders before and after treatment (P = 0.03, 0.005, respectively). The expression of type II IFN signaling-related genes did not significantly differ before treatment; however, it increased in non-responders and decreased in responders, with a significant difference being observed after three months of treatment (P = 1.2×10<sup>-3</sup>). …”
  10. 62830

    Image_4_Dynamics of Type I and Type II Interferon Signature Determines Responsiveness to Anti-TNF Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis.jpeg by Takeshi Iwasaki (3279906)

    Published 2022
    “…The expression of type I IFN signaling-related genes was higher in non-responders than in responders before and after treatment (P = 0.03, 0.005, respectively). The expression of type II IFN signaling-related genes did not significantly differ before treatment; however, it increased in non-responders and decreased in responders, with a significant difference being observed after three months of treatment (P = 1.2×10<sup>-3</sup>). …”
  11. 62831

    DataSheet_2_Dynamics of Type I and Type II Interferon Signature Determines Responsiveness to Anti-TNF Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis.docx by Takeshi Iwasaki (3279906)

    Published 2022
    “…The expression of type I IFN signaling-related genes was higher in non-responders than in responders before and after treatment (P = 0.03, 0.005, respectively). The expression of type II IFN signaling-related genes did not significantly differ before treatment; however, it increased in non-responders and decreased in responders, with a significant difference being observed after three months of treatment (P = 1.2×10<sup>-3</sup>). …”
  12. 62832

    Changes of tumor volume and normalized perfusion parameters. by Jian-Wei Wang (5654263)

    Published 2013
    “…<p>A, There were significant differences of tumor volumes between control and treated groups on days 6 (* = <i>P</i><0.001) while there were no significant differences in tumor volume on days 0, 2 and 4 (<i>P</i>>0.05). …”
  13. 62833

    Inhibitory effects of curcumin on RPE–choroid production of angiogenic and inflammatory molecules. by Ping Xie (112003)

    Published 2013
    “…<p>Curcumine significantly suppressed RPE–choroid protein levels of VEGF (<b>A: </b><i>n</i> = 6. *<i>P</i><0.01), TNF<i>-</i>α (<b>B: </b><i>n</i> = 6. …”
  14. 62834

    Intersubunit Ionic Interactions Stabilize the Nucleoside Diphosphate Kinase of <em>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</em> by Florian Georgescauld (385363)

    Published 2013
    “…Indeed, guanidinium and many other salts stabilized the hexamer with a half maximum effect of about 0.1 M, increasing protein thermostability. …”
  15. 62835
  16. 62836

    The structural coefficient <i>σ</i> depends on the migration probability <i>v</i>, the mutation probability <i>u</i>, and the migration range <i>r</i>. by Yanling Zhang (6561)

    Published 2016
    “…Parameters: <i>N</i> = 100, <i>M</i> = 9, (A) <i>u</i> = 0.07, (B) <i>v</i> = 0.1.</p>…”
  17. 62837

    Data_Sheet_1_Mendelian randomization analysis demonstrates the causal effects of IGF family members in diabetes.PDF by Xing Li (134367)

    Published 2024
    “…To test the robustness of the results, we also employed MR-Egger regression, the weighted median method, and a leave-one-out analysis.</p>Results<p>Our study revealed that IGF-1 causally increases the risk of Type 2 Diabetes (T2D), while IGFBP-6, adiponectin and INSR decreases the risk (IGF-1, OR 1.02 [95% CI 1–1.03], p = 0.01; IGFBP-6, OR 0.92 [95% CI 0.87–0.98], p = 0.01; Adiponectin, OR 0.837 [95% CI 0.721–0.970], p = 0.018; INSR, OR 0.910 [95% CI 0.872–0.950], p = 1.52 × 10–5). …”
  18. 62838

    Data_Sheet_2_Mendelian randomization analysis demonstrates the causal effects of IGF family members in diabetes.PDF by Xing Li (134367)

    Published 2024
    “…To test the robustness of the results, we also employed MR-Egger regression, the weighted median method, and a leave-one-out analysis.</p>Results<p>Our study revealed that IGF-1 causally increases the risk of Type 2 Diabetes (T2D), while IGFBP-6, adiponectin and INSR decreases the risk (IGF-1, OR 1.02 [95% CI 1–1.03], p = 0.01; IGFBP-6, OR 0.92 [95% CI 0.87–0.98], p = 0.01; Adiponectin, OR 0.837 [95% CI 0.721–0.970], p = 0.018; INSR, OR 0.910 [95% CI 0.872–0.950], p = 1.52 × 10–5). …”
  19. 62839

    Data_Sheet_4_Mendelian randomization analysis demonstrates the causal effects of IGF family members in diabetes.PDF by Xing Li (134367)

    Published 2024
    “…To test the robustness of the results, we also employed MR-Egger regression, the weighted median method, and a leave-one-out analysis.</p>Results<p>Our study revealed that IGF-1 causally increases the risk of Type 2 Diabetes (T2D), while IGFBP-6, adiponectin and INSR decreases the risk (IGF-1, OR 1.02 [95% CI 1–1.03], p = 0.01; IGFBP-6, OR 0.92 [95% CI 0.87–0.98], p = 0.01; Adiponectin, OR 0.837 [95% CI 0.721–0.970], p = 0.018; INSR, OR 0.910 [95% CI 0.872–0.950], p = 1.52 × 10–5). …”
  20. 62840

    Data_Sheet_3_Mendelian randomization analysis demonstrates the causal effects of IGF family members in diabetes.PDF by Xing Li (134367)

    Published 2024
    “…To test the robustness of the results, we also employed MR-Egger regression, the weighted median method, and a leave-one-out analysis.</p>Results<p>Our study revealed that IGF-1 causally increases the risk of Type 2 Diabetes (T2D), while IGFBP-6, adiponectin and INSR decreases the risk (IGF-1, OR 1.02 [95% CI 1–1.03], p = 0.01; IGFBP-6, OR 0.92 [95% CI 0.87–0.98], p = 0.01; Adiponectin, OR 0.837 [95% CI 0.721–0.970], p = 0.018; INSR, OR 0.910 [95% CI 0.872–0.950], p = 1.52 × 10–5). …”