Search alternatives:
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
0 decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
01 0 » 0 0 (Expand Search), 1 0 (Expand Search), 01 1 (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
0 decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
01 0 » 0 0 (Expand Search), 1 0 (Expand Search), 01 1 (Expand Search)
-
181
-
182
-
183
-
184
-
185
Image8_Orally Administered Probiotics Decrease Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans but Not Other Periodontal Pathogenic Bacteria Counts in the Oral Cavity: A Systematic Review an...
Published 2021“…</p><p>Results: The results showed a significant decrease in the overall count of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans in the probiotic-treated group compared to the control at 4 weeks (SMD: −0.28; 95% CI: −0.56–−0.01; p = 0.045) but not later. …”
-
186
Table2_Orally Administered Probiotics Decrease Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans but Not Other Periodontal Pathogenic Bacteria Counts in the Oral Cavity: A Systematic Review an...
Published 2021“…</p><p>Results: The results showed a significant decrease in the overall count of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans in the probiotic-treated group compared to the control at 4 weeks (SMD: −0.28; 95% CI: −0.56–−0.01; p = 0.045) but not later. …”
-
187
Table1_Orally Administered Probiotics Decrease Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans but Not Other Periodontal Pathogenic Bacteria Counts in the Oral Cavity: A Systematic Review an...
Published 2021“…</p><p>Results: The results showed a significant decrease in the overall count of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans in the probiotic-treated group compared to the control at 4 weeks (SMD: −0.28; 95% CI: −0.56–−0.01; p = 0.045) but not later. …”
-
188
-
189
-
190
-
191
-
192
-
193
Hepatic Expression of Detoxification Enzymes Is Decreased in Human Obstructive Cholestasis Due to Gallstone Biliary Obstruction
Published 2015“…</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>The levels of hepatic detoxification enzymes were significantly decreased in human obstructive cholestasis, and these decreases were positively associated with a marked reduction of FXR levels. …”
-
194
EphA4 immunostaining is decreased adjacent to injury site in ephrin-A5-Fc treated mice.
Published 2011“…Arrows indicate lesion site. Scale bars in A–D, G,H, 100 µm; E,F, 50 µm.</p>…”
-
195
-
196
TUDCA decreases ER stress in HOX neonatal rat lungs.
Published 2022“…<p>(<b>A</b>) The expression levels of ER stress markers (P-PERK 0.6±0.1-fold, p<0.001, n = 5; PERK 0.7±0.1-fold, p = 0.00364, n = 5; P-IRE1α 0.6±0.0-fold, p<0.001, n = 5; IRE1α 0.6±0.1-fold, p<0.001, n = 5; GRP78 0.8±0.1-fold, p<0.001, n = 5; cleaved ATF6 0.1±0.0-fold, p<0.001, n = 5; spliced XBP1 0.3±0.0-fold, p<0.001, n = 5; 2 males and 3 females) are all decreased while the N-glycosylated VEGFR2 is increased (3.5±0.2-fold, p<0.001, n = 5) in HOX neonatal lungs at P10 indicating TUDCA can attenuate hyperoxia-induced ER stress. …”
-
197
-
198
-
199
Decrease of 4 Asp isomers at 70°C.
Published 2013“…<p><a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0058515#pone-0058515-g007" target="_blank">Figure 7a:</a> decrease of L-α-Asp with incubation of T6-Lα peptide at 70°C. …”
-
200
Correlations between the decrease in PRCP activity and changes in several metabolic and biochemical parameters after diet or bariatric surgery (*p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01).
Published 2018“…<p>Correlations between the decrease in PRCP activity and changes in several metabolic and biochemical parameters after diet or bariatric surgery (*p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01).…”