Search alternatives:
ns decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), use decreased (Expand Search)
0 decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search), a decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search)
01 0 » 0 0 (Expand Search), 1 0 (Expand Search), 01 1 (Expand Search)
ns decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), use decreased (Expand Search)
0 decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search), a decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search)
01 0 » 0 0 (Expand Search), 1 0 (Expand Search), 01 1 (Expand Search)
-
1
Downregulation of DOM decreases the abundance of PER and TIM.
Published 2019“…Error bars represent ± SEM; n.s., non significant,*<i>P</i> < 0.05,**p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, one-way ANOVA. …”
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
Exposure to low CO<sub>2</sub> levels decreases ER cholesterol levels.
Published 2023“…<b>(D, E)</b> The free cholesterol and cholesterol ester levels in the ER membrane from the cells as in <b>(C)</b>, were quantified with shotgun lipidomics analysis (see <a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002367#pbio.3002367.s007" target="_blank">S7 Fig</a> and <a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002367#pbio.3002367.s012" target="_blank">S5 Table</a>) (mean ± SE, <i>n</i> = 3 independent experiments, **<i>P</i> < 0.01, *<i>P</i> < 0.05, nonsignificant (ns) two-sided Student’s <i>t</i> test). …”
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
Scenario (6): Parameter variation (50% decrease)—With 5 N.m load applied at t = 0.3s.
Published 2023“…<p>Scenario (6): Parameter variation (50% decrease)—With 5 N.m load applied at t = 0.3s.…”
-
14
-
15
-
16
SLE decreases risk for hormonal cancers.
Published 2021“…An OR to the left of the solid line represents a reduction in risk. (a) Breast cancer incidence in female SLE cohort is significantly decreased by SLE status (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.35, 0.74, p = 0.0036). …”
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20