Search alternatives:
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search)
0 decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
05 0 » 0 0 (Expand Search), 01 0 (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search)
0 decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
05 0 » 0 0 (Expand Search), 01 0 (Expand Search)
-
161
-
162
HFD induces LDs and decreases ER and mitochondria in nephrocytes.
Published 2021“…Data were statistically analysed using LMMs followed by a Wald chi-squared test. Asterisks show statistical significance (* <i>p</i> < 0.05, ** <i>p</i> < 0.005, ***<i>p</i> < 0.0005), and ns indicates <i>p</i> > 0.05 in this and all subsequent graphs. …”
-
163
-
164
Decreased Aβ42 halo overlaps with the decreased incidence of DNs in FO treated mice.
Published 2019“…(E-H) In the FO-treated 5xFAD animals the decreased surface of the Aβ halo overlaps with the decreased incidence of swollen, dystrophic neurites.…”
-
165
Decreased cell stiffness after dissociation of intercellular adhesion.
Published 2014“…Cell stiffness was measured before and after the nanorobotic surgery and decreases from 30.0±1.5 kPa to 20.5±2.8 kPa, respectively. …”
-
166
-
167
-
168
-
169
-
170
-
171
-
172
-
173
-
174
-
175
-
176
-
177
Exposure to shear stress leads to a decrease in wild-type AQP5 but no change in N228K AQP5 (n = 3; * p<0.05 with ANOVA one-way).
Published 2013“…<p>Exposure to shear stress leads to a decrease in wild-type AQP5 but no change in N228K AQP5 (n = 3; * p<0.05 with ANOVA one-way).…”
-
178
(R)-albuterol decreases cytokine mRNA levels in activated T cells
Published 2011“…Data are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 3) *p < 0.05 (CP vs R).…”
-
179
-
180