Search alternatives:
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
0 decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
0 decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
39701
-
39702
-
39703
-
39704
-
39705
-
39706
Disruption of the Syp/VAMP2 complex.
Published 2013“…(<b>g</b>) Quantification of the extent of co-localisation between Syp and VAMP2. Aβ42 treated neurons left to recover for 2 hrs showed decreased level of co-localisation (M = 0.85±0.09, n = 24) compared to control (M = 0.961±0.03, n = 24, student t-test ** = 0.0003), whereas neurons left to recover for 15 min (M = 0.99±0.02, n = 24) or incubated with the scrambled peptide (M = 0.99±0.01, n = 18) did not display differences compared to control. …”
-
39707
-
39708
-
39709
-
39710
-
39711
-
39712
-
39713
-
39714
-
39715
-
39716
-
39717
-
39718
-
39719
Diet weighted mean of prey traits along the gradient in predator body size.
Published 2023“…<p>(A) primary producers are overrepresented in the diet of smaller predators, but their representation progressively decreases along size classes (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.26, P = 0.02). …”
-
39720
Data_Sheet_1_Behavioral consistency of competitive behaviors and feeding patterns in lactating dairy cows across stocking densities at the feed bunk.docx
Published 2024“…</p>Results and dicsussion<p>Cows displayed the most competitive behaviors at 2:1 stocking density (p < 0.0001) but experienced the highest rate of contacts per minute of eating time at 4:1 (1:1 vs. 2:1 vs. 4:1: 0.09 vs. 0.95 vs. 1.60 contacts/min; p < 0.0001). …”