Search alternatives:
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), use decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search), b1 decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
09 a » 19 a (Expand Search), 09 1 (Expand Search), 09 0 (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), use decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search), b1 decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
09 a » 19 a (Expand Search), 09 1 (Expand Search), 09 0 (Expand Search)
-
101
-
102
-
103
Annual treatment frequencies in recurrence and non-recurrence groups.
Published 2025“…Mean outpatient visits in the recurrence group decreased from 13.6 ± 3.0 to 11.9 ± 5.0, 8.1 ± 3.9, and 7.8 ± 3.2 at 1, 2, and 3 years postoperatively, respectively (Kruskal-Wallis test, p < 0.001). …”
-
104
Annual treatment frequencies in all eyes.
Published 2025“…<p>The number of anti-VEGF treatments, STTA, MA-PC, PPV, and total treatments (mean ± SD) significantly decreased from 2.6 ± 1.6, 0.3 ± 0.8, 0.6 ± 0.8, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 3.7 ± 1.7 preoperatively to 0.8 ± 1.9, 0.0 ± 0.2, 0.3 ± 1.0, 0.0, and 1.2 ± 2.2; at year 2 to 0.7 ± 2.0, 0.1 ± 0.6, 0.0 ± 0.2, 0.0 ± 0.2, and 1.0 ± 2.1; and at year 3 to 0.9 ± 2.2, 0.0, 0.2 ± 1.0, 0.0 ± 0.2, and 1.1 ± 3.1 (Kruskal–Wallis test, P < 0.001; Dunn’s test, **P < 0.01). …”
-
105
Annual number of outpatient visits in recurrence and non-recurrence groups.
Published 2025“…<p>In the recurrence group, mean outpatient visits (± standard deviation) decreased from 13.6 ± 3.0 to 11.9 ± 5.0, 8.1 ± 3.9, and 7.8 ± 3.2 at 1, 2, and 3 years postoperatively, respectively (Kruskal-Wallis test, P < 0.001; Dunn’s test, **P < 0.01). …”
-
106
Annual number of outpatient visits in all eyes.
Published 2025“…<p>Mean visit frequency (mean ± standard deviation) significantly decreased from 11.5 ± 4.3 preoperatively to 8.8 ± 4.1, 5.0 ± 3.4, and 4.4 ± 3.2 visits in the first, second, and third postoperative years, respectively (Kruskal–Wallis test, P < 0.001; Dunn’s test, **P < 0.01). …”
-
107
-
108
-
109
-
110
-
111
Presentation_1_Airway macrophages display decreased expression of receptors mediating and regulating scavenging in early cystic fibrosis lung disease.pdf
Published 2023“…AM expression of immune checkpoint molecule SIRPα also decreased with age (p = 0.0006), but did not correlate with BALF %neutrophils. …”
-
112
-
113
-
114
-
115
-
116
Decreased activity of FASII favors the cold growth of the <i>ΔcshA</i> strain.
Published 2020“…<p><b>(A)</b><i>fapR</i> mRNA levels decrease in ACC and biotin related suppressor strains. …”
-
117
S1 Data -
Published 2024“…The mean connectivity decreased to r = 0.09 (95% CI 0.03–0.16) when test-retest reliability and auto-correlations of single time courses were considered, indicating that less than a quarter of connectivity is detectable. …”
-
118
Connectivity statistics.
Published 2024“…The mean connectivity decreased to r = 0.09 (95% CI 0.03–0.16) when test-retest reliability and auto-correlations of single time courses were considered, indicating that less than a quarter of connectivity is detectable. …”
-
119
Advancing the science of NOWS research.
Published 2024“…Understanding which infants will develop NOWS soon after birth could reduce hospital stays for infants who do not develop NOWS and decrease burdens on hospitals and clinicians. We propose noninvasive clinical indicators of NOWS, including newborn neurobehavior, autonomic biomarkers, prenatal substance exposures, and socioeconomic environments. …”
-
120
Protocol measures.
Published 2024“…Understanding which infants will develop NOWS soon after birth could reduce hospital stays for infants who do not develop NOWS and decrease burdens on hospitals and clinicians. We propose noninvasive clinical indicators of NOWS, including newborn neurobehavior, autonomic biomarkers, prenatal substance exposures, and socioeconomic environments. …”