Showing 40,301 - 40,320 results of 206,687 for search '(( 1 0 decrease ) OR ( 50 ((a decrease) OR (((nn decrease) OR (mean decrease)))) ))', query time: 2.48s Refine Results
  1. 40301
  2. 40302
  3. 40303

    DataSheet1_A potential of iron slag-based soil amendment as a suppressor of greenhouse gas (CH4 and N2O) emissions in rice paddy.docx by Snowie Jane C. Galgo (18102058)

    Published 2024
    “…We could find evidence of a more suppressed N<sub>2</sub>O flux by applying the electron acceptor-added SFs (SF<sub>2.5</sub> and SF<sub>5.0</sub>) to a 49%–56% decrease over the control. …”
  4. 40304
  5. 40305
  6. 40306
  7. 40307
  8. 40308
  9. 40309
  10. 40310
  11. 40311
  12. 40312
  13. 40313

    Image_1_Preoperative nTMS and Intraoperative Neurophysiology - A Comparative Analysis in Patients With Motor-Eloquent Glioma.tiff by Tizian Rosenstock (10837449)

    Published 2021
    “…Irreversible MEP amplitude decrease >50% was associated with worse motor outcome in all patients, while a MEP amplitude decrease50% or lower SCS intensities ≤4mA were particularly correlated with a postoperative worsened motor status in nTMS-stratified high-risk cases. …”
  14. 40314
  15. 40315
  16. 40316
  17. 40317
  18. 40318
  19. 40319

    Table_1_v1_Role of Female Research at the Asociacion Mexicana de Cirugia General Annual Meeting: A Retrospective Analysis From 2013 to 2019.docx by Lorelí Mejía-Fernández (12539746)

    Published 2022
    “…The percentage of females’ abstracts selected for oral presentation was less than the percentage of males’ 49 abstracts selected for presentation (9% vs. 11.5%; p = 0.002). Females’ abstracts submitted have a 50 23.5% decreased chance of being selected for oral presentation (OR = 0.765, CI 95%, 0.639–0.917, 51 p = 0.003). …”
  20. 40320

    Table_1_v1_Role of Female Research at the Asociacion Mexicana de Cirugia General Annual Meeting: A Retrospective Analysis From 2013 to 2019.docx by Lorelí Mejía-Fernández (12539746)

    Published 2022
    “…The percentage of females’ abstracts selected for oral presentation was less than the percentage of males’ 49 abstracts selected for presentation (9% vs. 11.5%; p = 0.002). Females’ abstracts submitted have a 50 23.5% decreased chance of being selected for oral presentation (OR = 0.765, CI 95%, 0.639–0.917, 51 p = 0.003). …”