Search alternatives:
10 decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
1 10 » _ 10 (Expand Search), x 10 (Expand Search), 1 1 (Expand Search)
10 decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
1 10 » _ 10 (Expand Search), x 10 (Expand Search), 1 1 (Expand Search)
-
40221
Projections of the impact of Combination I intervention on HIV incidence.
Published 2013“…Incidence reductions of more than 50% (IRR<0.5) are delineated and the star marks IRR value with risk behaviour change assumptions as in (A) and <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0054575#pone-0054575-t002" target="_blank">Table 2</a>, (<b>C</b>) Projections of percentage reduction in incidence of the Combination I intervention with respect to current standard incidence projection of 2.1 (1.9–2.3) per 100 pyar at year 15 with various assumptions of failure to achieve the uptake levels of the interventions in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0054575#pone-0054575-t002" target="_blank">Table 2:</a> (Ia) decreasing testing uptake to 60% in community testing rounds, (Ib) doubling the drop out rate on treatment to 28% per year, (Ic) halving the uptake of circumcision to 35% of uncircumcised men, and (Id) assuming no risk behaviour change following HIV diagnosis generated by testing.…”
-
40222
-
40223
-
40224
-
40225
-
40226
-
40227
-
40228
-
40229
-
40230
-
40231
-
40232
-
40233
-
40234
-
40235
-
40236
-
40237
-
40238
-
40239
-
40240