Search alternatives:
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search), b1 decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search), b1 decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
201
-
202
-
203
-
204
-
205
-
206
-
207
-
208
Inflammation is not sufficient to account for decreased relative bacterial numbers in higher dose infection.
Published 2012“…<p>A) C57BL/6 mice or CCR2 KO mice receiving Gr1-depleting antibody were infected with either 10<sup>3</sup> or 10<sup>7</sup> NMII <i>Coxiella</i>. …”
-
209
Treatment with anti-JAM-C antibody decreases the severity of antigen-induced arthritis
Published 2011“…Results shown represent the mean ± SEM for anti-JAM-C antibody-treated (= 5 on day 4, = 6 on day 8, black columns) and isotype-matched control antibody-treated (= 5 at both time points, open columns) mice. …”
-
210
-
211
-
212
Disruption of bacterial K<sup>+</sup> homeostasis decreases Mtb colonization of macrophages.
Published 2019“…Each point on the graph represents a bacterium or a tight cluster of bacteria (black circles—WT, red squares– Δ<i>ceoBC</i>, blue triangles—<i>ceoBC</i>*). p-values were obtained with a Mann-Whitney statistical test. …”
-
213
-
214
-
215
-
216
-
217
-
218
Table_1_A phased intervention bundle to decrease the mortality of patients with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in intensive care unit.pdf
Published 2022“…The mean (SD) APECHII score was 24.1 (7.5). Overall, the mortality of ECMO decreased from 57.1% at baseline to 21.8% at 13–18 months after implementation of the study intervention (P < 0.001). …”
-
219
-
220
The mean and standard deviation of parameters.
Published 2024“…Additionally, one-way ANCOVA revealed a significant difference between the groups post-treatment (F(1,31) = 6.011, P = 0.020, η2 = 0.162) and one month post-treatment (F(1,31) = 4.889, P = 0.035, η2 = 0.136), with ML SI being significantly lower in the exergaming group than the balance training group at both time points. …”