Showing 61 - 80 results of 138,478 for search '(( 1 m decrease ) OR ( 5 ((wt decrease) OR (((we decrease) OR (a decrease)))) ))', query time: 1.81s Refine Results
  1. 61

    mGluR5 receptor decreased glycinergic currents. by Zi-Yang Zhang (4988555)

    Published 2019
    “…(<b>F</b>) Postsynaptic loading of U-0126 or PD98059 prevented CHPG from decreasing glycinergic responses (U-0126, 107.6 ± 10.4% of baseline at 15–20 min post-CHPG, <i>t</i>[8] = 0.997, <i>p</i> = 0.348; PD98059, 93.1 ± 5.0% of baseline at 15–20 min post-CHPG, <i>t</i>[5] = 0.883, <i>p</i> = 0.418). …”
  2. 62
  3. 63
  4. 64
  5. 65
  6. 66
  7. 67
  8. 68
  9. 69
  10. 70
  11. 71
  12. 72

    Decreased activity of FASII favors the cold growth of the <i>ΔcshA</i> strain. by Vanessa Khemici (814639)

    Published 2020
    “…<i>fapR</i> mRNA levels were quantified by RT-qPCR using 16S rRNA as reference gene on total RNAs extracted from <i>wt</i> strain (PR01), <i>ΔcshA</i> strain (PR01-ΔcshA), and suppressor strains <i>ΔcshA/accC</i><sup><i>M385V</i></sup> (C51), <i>ΔcshA/accC</i><sup><i>T183I</i></sup> (sup30), <i>ΔcshA/accD</i><sup><i>F253V</i></sup> (sup17), <i>ΔcshA/accD</i><sup><i>A164V</i></sup> (sup16), <i>ΔcshA/birA</i><sup><i>D320F-FsX28</i></sup> (C58), <i>ΔcshA/birA</i><sup><i>R280stop</i></sup> (sup1) and <i>ΔcshA/bioY</i><sup><i>P123R-FsX1</i></sup> (C66), all at exponential growth phase in MH medium at 25°C. n = 5 for <i>ΔcshA</i>, <i>4 for wt</i> and 3 for all others. …”
  13. 73
  14. 74
  15. 75

    RAGE protein and mRNA levels are decreased after silica injury. by Lasse Ramsgaard (351159)

    Published 2013
    “…<p>(A) Western blot of total protein in lung homogenate of lungs from control and silica treated WT mice, 5 µg of protein were loaded per lane. …”
  16. 76
  17. 77
  18. 78
  19. 79

    SLE T cells display more genes with increased rather than decreased expression. by Sean J. Bradley (823158)

    Published 2015
    “…<p><b>A)</b> Distribution of expression stratified at the 1.5-, 2-fold and q<0.05 CUFFDIFF2 significance levels. …”
  20. 80