Search alternatives:
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
ng decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
_ step » _ stem (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
ng decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
_ step » _ stem (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
Demographic and clinical variables (mean ± standard deviation) for study participants (n = 54).
Published 2021Subjects: -
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
Spatial representation of mean annual soil loss increase/decrease derived with the different modeling centers (rows) and time steps (columns) with the SSP5-8.5.
Published 2023“…<p>Spatial representation of mean annual soil loss increase/decrease derived with the different modeling centers (rows) and time steps (columns) with the SSP5-8.5.…”
-
8
Table of step height.
Published 2024“…Finally, by making corresponding test blocks, it was found that the peak value of forward resistance when the 10.5°test block crossed the steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height decreased by 19.8%, 25.0% and 13.9% respectively, and the mean value decreased by 30.8%, 27.2% and 24.1% respectively, which was close to the simulation results, and verified the accuracy of the finite element analysis results.…”
-
9
The well wall step.
Published 2024“…Finally, by making corresponding test blocks, it was found that the peak value of forward resistance when the 10.5°test block crossed the steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height decreased by 19.8%, 25.0% and 13.9% respectively, and the mean value decreased by 30.8%, 27.2% and 24.1% respectively, which was close to the simulation results, and verified the accuracy of the finite element analysis results.…”
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20