Showing 801 - 820 results of 1,771 for search '(( 10 (((per OR peter) decrease) OR (((nn decrease) OR (a decrease)))) ) OR ( 6 b decrease ))*', query time: 0.25s Refine Results
  1. 801
  2. 802

    The spectral and morphological studies of the conductive polyaniline thin film derivatives by the in situ copolymerization by Waware, Umesh S.

    Published 2017
    “…The blue shift in the band indicates that there is a decrease in the extent of conjugation system along the copolymer. …”
    Get full text
    Get full text
  3. 803
  4. 804
  5. 805

    Bench-scale and packed bed sorption of methylene blue using treated olive pomace and charcoal by Banat, F.

    Published 2006
    “…The breakthrough time increased with increasing bed height, decreasing flow rate and decreasing influent concentration and methylene blue dye uptake. …”
    Get full text
    Get full text
  6. 806
  7. 807
  8. 808

    Physico-mechanical Properties of Sustainable Building Material Based Gypsum and Recycled Polyethylene Waste by Amina, Djoudi

    Published 2023
    “…Results proved the positive effect of the introducing of PET particles in the matrix of gypsum mortar, the lightening of this material but a decrease of mechanical properties was recorded comparing in to reference without polyethylene particles. …”
    Get full text
    Get full text
  9. 809
  10. 810
  11. 811

    Results from the first culturally tailored, multidisciplinary diabetes education in Lebanese adults with type 2 diabetes: effects on self-care and metabolic outcomes by Sukkarieh-Haraty, Ola

    Published 2022
    “…This pilot-study tested the effect of culturally-tailored education targeting diabetes selfcare on glycemia and cardiovascular risk factors of Lebanese with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) (n = 27; Age: 61 ± 10 yrs, 59% males, HbA1c: 8.98 ± 1.38%). Results: Diabetes self-care (Diet, Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose and foot care) improved after 6 months, which was reflected in a significant drop in glycemic levels (HbA1c:-0.5%; FPG: − 38 mg/dl), and cholesterol/HDL ratio (4.45 ± 1.39 vs. 4.06 ± 1.29). …”
    Get full text
    Get full text
    Get full text
  12. 812
  13. 813
  14. 814
  15. 815
  16. 816
  17. 817
  18. 818
  19. 819
  20. 820