Showing 681 - 700 results of 1,775 for search '(( 10 ((peer decrease) OR (((nn decrease) OR (a decrease)))) ) OR ( 19 a decrease ))*', query time: 0.14s Refine Results
  1. 681
  2. 682

    Impact of Pulsed Dielectrophoretic Supply on the Function of Microorganisms in Membrane Bioreactors by Larbi B.

    Published 2018
    “…At high electrical potentials (100 and 150 V), the microbial activity decreased as a result of the increased current flow and temperature build up due to the Joule heating effect. …”
    Get full text
    Get full text
  3. 683
  4. 684
  5. 685
  6. 686
  7. 687
  8. 688

    Evaluation of different personalized ventilation air terminal devices: Inhalation vs. clothing-mediated exposures by Al Assaad, Douaa

    Published 2021
    “…The model was validated experimentally in a climatic chamber by comparing real-time particle mass concentration near a thermal manikin. …”
    Get full text
    Get full text
  9. 689
  10. 690
  11. 691
  12. 692
  13. 693
  14. 694

    EPIDEMIOLOGY OF CHLAMYDIA TRACHOMATIS IN LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW, META-ANALYSES, AND META-REGRESSIONS by ABU-EL-RUZ, RASHA

    Published 2022
    “…Results: The pooled-mean urogenital CT prevalence was 8.2% (95% CI: 7.5-9.1) for general populations, 14.0% (95%CI: 12.7-15.4) for female sex workers, 10.8% (95% CI: 8.4-13.4) for men who have sex with men, male sex workers, and transgenders, 16.1% (95% CI: 12.6-19.8) for symptomatic women, 25.4 (95% CI: 18.6-38.5) for symptomatic men, 9.7% (95%CI: 6.1-14) for HIV-positive individuals and individuals in HIV-discordant couples, and 11.9% (95 CI: 8.5-15.8) for STI clinic attendees. …”
    Get full text
  15. 695
  16. 696
  17. 697
  18. 698

    Effect of Verbal Encouragement on Performance and Affective Responses in Male Sport Science Students during Sprint Modalities by Sahli, Faten

    Published 2024
    “…Post hoc test analysis indicates a significant increase in physical performance during VETS and VESS conditions compared to the control condition due to a decrease in sprint in line 20 m (VETS: p < 0.001, d = 0.55; VESS: p = 0.016, d = 0.41), sprint 10*2 (VETS: p < 0.001, d = 0.64; VESS: p = 0.05, d = 0.36), and sprint L (VETS: p = 0.001, d = 1.19) times compared to the control condition. …”
    Get full text
    Get full text
  19. 699
  20. 700