Showing 1 - 20 results of 262,918 for search '(( 10 ((we decrease) OR (((mean decrease) OR (_ decrease)))) ) OR ( a greater decrease ))*', query time: 1.43s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2

    Normalized synergy increased with greater recurrence and decreased with greater feedback. by Samantha P. Sherrill (11114128)

    Published 2021
    “…Errorbars are 95% bootstrap confidence intervals around the mean.</p>…”
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9

    Adjusted<sup>a</sup> mean decrease in days elapsed in the cascade of HCC care post-intervention. by Yapei Zhang (6416108)

    Published 2022
    “…<p>Adjusted<a href="/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000080#t004fn001" target="_blank"><sup>a</sup></a> mean decrease in days elapsed in the cascade of HCC care post-intervention.…”
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12

    Graphical example of how mean squared error (MSE) can decrease while skill gets worse for two region example. by Graham Casey Gibson (7962281)

    Published 2021
    “…Since a decrease in MSE means an improvement and a decrease in forecast skill means a lack of improvement, we see that coherence can have opposite effects on the two scores.…”
  13. 13

    Does Mean Platelet Volume Decrease in the presence of Coronary Artery Fistula? by Isa Sincer (7234577)

    Published 2019
    “…Conclusion: The present study suggests that MPV may decrease in patients with CAF.</p></div>…”
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17

    TMD residues decrease sensitivity. by Ákos Nemecz (356830)

    Published 2017
    “…Light red and green zones with dashed lines represent the respective ½ log decrease and increase from Wt. Values outside this region are color coded for ease of interpretation, with red and darker red as significant decreases and a decrease of greater significance, respectively. …”
  18. 18
  19. 19

    nLTD decreases the molecular proximity between endogenous spine cofilin and F-actin by Barbara Calabrese (553229)

    Published 2014
    “…Data are expressed as mean ± SEM of the “% FRET” values determined using the Zeiss LSM 510 software module for FRET acceptor photobleaching (see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0094787#s2" target="_blank">Methods</a>); *p<0.05, **p<0.01 compared to control alone; <sup>#</sup>p<0.05 compared to nLTD alone; <sup>XX</sup>p<0.01 compared to CIN alone, two-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni post hoc test., (number of spines: ctrl = 43, nLTD = 29, CIN = 49, CIN+nLTD = 77). …”
  20. 20