Table7.DOCX by Brittney N. Keel (4886881)

“…Our results show that BWA and Bowtie2 tend to be more robust than HISAT2, while HISAT2 was significantly faster and used less memory than both BWA and Bowtie2. We conclude that there is not a single mapper that is ideal in all scenarios but rather the choice of alignment tool should be driven by the application and sequencing technology.…”

Table8.DOCX by Brittney N. Keel (4886881)

“…Our results show that BWA and Bowtie2 tend to be more robust than HISAT2, while HISAT2 was significantly faster and used less memory than both BWA and Bowtie2. We conclude that there is not a single mapper that is ideal in all scenarios but rather the choice of alignment tool should be driven by the application and sequencing technology.…”

Image8.PDF by Brittney N. Keel (4886881)

“…Our results show that BWA and Bowtie2 tend to be more robust than HISAT2, while HISAT2 was significantly faster and used less memory than both BWA and Bowtie2. We conclude that there is not a single mapper that is ideal in all scenarios but rather the choice of alignment tool should be driven by the application and sequencing technology.…”

Image2.PDF by Brittney N. Keel (4886881)

“…Our results show that BWA and Bowtie2 tend to be more robust than HISAT2, while HISAT2 was significantly faster and used less memory than both BWA and Bowtie2. We conclude that there is not a single mapper that is ideal in all scenarios but rather the choice of alignment tool should be driven by the application and sequencing technology.…”

Table9.DOCX by Brittney N. Keel (4886881)

“…Our results show that BWA and Bowtie2 tend to be more robust than HISAT2, while HISAT2 was significantly faster and used less memory than both BWA and Bowtie2. We conclude that there is not a single mapper that is ideal in all scenarios but rather the choice of alignment tool should be driven by the application and sequencing technology.…”

Table2.XLSX by Brittney N. Keel (4886881)

“…Our results show that BWA and Bowtie2 tend to be more robust than HISAT2, while HISAT2 was significantly faster and used less memory than both BWA and Bowtie2. We conclude that there is not a single mapper that is ideal in all scenarios but rather the choice of alignment tool should be driven by the application and sequencing technology.…”

Table14.DOCX by Brittney N. Keel (4886881)

“…Our results show that BWA and Bowtie2 tend to be more robust than HISAT2, while HISAT2 was significantly faster and used less memory than both BWA and Bowtie2. We conclude that there is not a single mapper that is ideal in all scenarios but rather the choice of alignment tool should be driven by the application and sequencing technology.…”

Table12.DOCX by Brittney N. Keel (4886881)

“…Our results show that BWA and Bowtie2 tend to be more robust than HISAT2, while HISAT2 was significantly faster and used less memory than both BWA and Bowtie2. We conclude that there is not a single mapper that is ideal in all scenarios but rather the choice of alignment tool should be driven by the application and sequencing technology.…”

Table11.DOCX by Brittney N. Keel (4886881)

“…Our results show that BWA and Bowtie2 tend to be more robust than HISAT2, while HISAT2 was significantly faster and used less memory than both BWA and Bowtie2. We conclude that there is not a single mapper that is ideal in all scenarios but rather the choice of alignment tool should be driven by the application and sequencing technology.…”

Table13.DOCX by Brittney N. Keel (4886881)

“…Our results show that BWA and Bowtie2 tend to be more robust than HISAT2, while HISAT2 was significantly faster and used less memory than both BWA and Bowtie2. We conclude that there is not a single mapper that is ideal in all scenarios but rather the choice of alignment tool should be driven by the application and sequencing technology.…”

Table3.XLSX by Brittney N. Keel (4886881)

“…Our results show that BWA and Bowtie2 tend to be more robust than HISAT2, while HISAT2 was significantly faster and used less memory than both BWA and Bowtie2. We conclude that there is not a single mapper that is ideal in all scenarios but rather the choice of alignment tool should be driven by the application and sequencing technology.…”

Image6.PDF by Brittney N. Keel (4886881)

“…Our results show that BWA and Bowtie2 tend to be more robust than HISAT2, while HISAT2 was significantly faster and used less memory than both BWA and Bowtie2. We conclude that there is not a single mapper that is ideal in all scenarios but rather the choice of alignment tool should be driven by the application and sequencing technology.…”

Germanium and Tin Analogues of Alkynes and Their Reduction Products by Lihung Pu (2461669)

“…One-electron reduction afforded a slight (ca. 0.03−0.05Å) lengthening of the Ge−Ge bonds in the case of germanium species <b>3</b> and <b>4</b> and a greater lengthening (ca. 0.13−0.15Å) for the Sn−Sn bonds in the tin compounds <b>10</b>−<b>13</b>. …”

Prediction of all-cause mortality after liver transplantation using left ventricular systolic and diastolic function assessment by Young-Jin Moon (2696887)

“…In multivariate Cox analysis, reduced LV ejection fraction (LVEF, <i>P</i> = 0.014) and decreased transmitral E/A ratio(<i>P</i> = 0.022) remained significant prognosticators. …”

Impact of different clear corneal incision sizes on anterior corneal aberration for cataract surgery by Qing-Qing Tan (8066828)

Supplementary Material for: National Trends in Emergency Room Visits of Dialysis Patients for Adverse Drug Reactions by Chan L. (5371679)

“…<b><i>Results:</i></b> While ED visits for ADEs decreased in both groups, they were over 10-fold higher in dialysis patients than non-dialysis patients (65.8–88.5 per 1,000 patients vs. 4.6–5.4 per 1,000 patients respectively, <i>p</i> < 0.001). …”

Autophagy protects murine preputial glands against premature aging, and controls their sebum phospholipid and pheromone profile by Heidemarie Rossiter (157377)

Effect of Diamond-Like Carbon Coating on Preventing the Ingress of Hydrogen into Bearing Steel by Renguo Lu (9332836)

Genetic comparison of populations of Piaractus brachypomus and P. orinoquensis (Characiformes: Serrasalmidae) of the Amazon and Orinoco basins by María Doris Escobar L. (13995625)

“…Piaractus brachypomus presented genetic diversity of A=6.5; He=0.72; Ho=0.67; Ĥ=1.000; ᴫ=0.0092, three management units related to the evolutionary process of the Amazon basin and the effective sizes of local populations were smaller compared to P. orinoquensis, which presented genetic diversity of A=6.1; He=0.66; Ho=0.55; Ĥ=0.968; ᴫ=0.010 and comprises only one management unit. …”

SPR and waveguide mode spectroscopy of infected MDCK cell monolayers. by Victor Yashunsky (123759)