Search alternatives:
30 decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search)
10 mean » 10 men (Expand Search)
_ 30 » _ 3 (Expand Search), _ 10 (Expand Search), _ 3d (Expand Search)
30 decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search)
10 mean » 10 men (Expand Search)
_ 30 » _ 3 (Expand Search), _ 10 (Expand Search), _ 3d (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
Mean change in incidence and diagnoses if testing rates decrease.
Published 2013“…<p>Change in incidence (A) and diagnoses (B) if testing rates decrease by 30% and 50% relative to the current testing rate.…”
-
3
TMD residues decrease sensitivity.
Published 2017“…The M2 α-helix of the neighboring subunit (labeled M2ʹ) is also highlighted in cyan and in cartoon representation. A table of the pH<sub>50</sub> and ΔpH<sub>50</sub> is shown below with mean values ± standard deviation for evaluated mutants with recorded values noted in <a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004470#pbio.2004470.s001" target="_blank">S1 Table</a>. …”
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
At lower concentrations, METH decreases LTP.
Published 2010“…At 0.1 µM METH, LTP was 1.58±.08 [<i>n</i> = 13(5)] (Fig. 1B); at 1 µM METH, LTP was 1.50±.07 [<i>n</i> = 13(7)] (Fig. 1C); at 10 µM METH, LTP was 1.58±.07 [<i>n</i> = 14(8)] (Fig. 1D); at 30 µM METH, LTP was 1.37±.06 [<i>n</i> = 15(4)] (Fig. 1E); and at 60 µM METH, LTP was 1.32±.24 [<i>n</i> = 4(2)] (Fig. 1E). …”
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
Repetitive stress induces a decrease in sound-evoked activity.
Published 2025“…Activity rates decreased during repeated stress compared to baseline (2-way ANOVA, condition F = 185.6, <i>p</i> = 4.8 × 10<sup>−42</sup>, condition: intensity interaction F = 10.37, <i>p</i> = 9.3 × 10<sup>−21</sup>, nested ANOVA (mouse nested within session), condition F = 174, <i>p</i> = 1.5 × 10<sup>−39</sup>, condition: intensity interaction F = 12.7, <i>p</i> = 2 × 10<sup>−26</sup>, post hoc for each level baseline versus repetitive stress <i>p</i> < 0.01 for all levels above 50 dB, all Bonferroni corrected). …”
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20