Search alternatives:
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
10 mean » 10 men (Expand Search)
a point » _ point (Expand Search), 5 point (Expand Search), _ points (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
10 mean » 10 men (Expand Search)
a point » _ point (Expand Search), 5 point (Expand Search), _ points (Expand Search)
-
201
-
202
The mean and standard deviation of parameters.
Published 2024“…Additionally, one-way ANCOVA revealed a significant difference between the groups post-treatment (F(1,31) = 6.011, P = 0.020, η2 = 0.162) and one month post-treatment (F(1,31) = 4.889, P = 0.035, η2 = 0.136), with ML SI being significantly lower in the exergaming group than the balance training group at both time points. …”
-
203
-
204
-
205
mGluR5 receptor decreased glycinergic currents.
Published 2019“…(<b>F</b>) Postsynaptic loading of U-0126 or PD98059 prevented CHPG from decreasing glycinergic responses (U-0126, 107.6 ± 10.4% of baseline at 15–20 min post-CHPG, <i>t</i>[8] = 0.997, <i>p</i> = 0.348; PD98059, 93.1 ± 5.0% of baseline at 15–20 min post-CHPG, <i>t</i>[5] = 0.883, <i>p</i> = 0.418). …”
-
206
-
207
-
208
-
209
-
210
-
211
-
212
-
213
-
214
-
215
Good things come to those who wait—Decreasing impatience for health gains and losses
Published 2020“…<div><p>Historically, time preferences are modelled by assuming constant discounting, which implies a constant level of impatience. The prevailing empirical finding, however, is decreasing impatience (DI), meaning that levels of impatience decrease over time. …”
-
216
Annual number of outpatient visits in all eyes.
Published 2025“…<p>Mean visit frequency (mean ± standard deviation) significantly decreased from 11.5 ± 4.3 preoperatively to 8.8 ± 4.1, 5.0 ± 3.4, and 4.4 ± 3.2 visits in the first, second, and third postoperative years, respectively (Kruskal–Wallis test, P < 0.001; Dunn’s test, **P < 0.01). …”
-
217
-
218
-
219
-
220