Search alternatives:
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
mg decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
10 mg » 10 mm (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
mg decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
10 mg » 10 mm (Expand Search)
-
321
-
322
Mean SARS-CoV-2 viral load log 10 between groups.
Published 2024“…</p><p>Results</p><p>From September 25, 2021, to February 3, 2022, 153 patients were randomized. The mean decay rate in SARS-CoV-2 viral load log<sub>10</sub> within 10 days was -3.75 (95% CI, -4.11; -3.19) in the placebo group, -3.83 (95% CI, -4.40; -2.27) in the halofuginone 0.5mg group and -4.13 (95% CI, -4.69; -3.57) in the halofuginone 1mg group, with no statistically significant difference in between placebo vs. halofuginone 0.5mg (mean difference -0.08; 95% CI -0.82 to 0.66, p = 0.96) and between placebo vs. halofuginone 1mg (mean difference -0.38; 95% CI, -1.11; 0.36, p = 0.41). …”
-
323
Activation of mitoK<sub>ATP</sub> channels decreased the latency time of the transjunctional currents in slice.
Published 2013“…<p>(<b>A</b>) Currents in S<sub>cell</sub> induced by a pair of ±160 mV voltage steps and the transjunctional currents received by the R<sub>cell</sub>. …”
-
324
-
325
-
326
-
327
Increases in 1,5-anhydrosorbitol and decreases in ascorbic acid following RYGB.
Published 2013“…B) For ascorbic acid, the ANOVA model did not detect group-specific changes over time (no group:time interaction), but indicated significant decreases from T0 to T6 in both groups. Overall, 1,5-anhydrosorbitol and ascorbic acid were significantly different at each time point between OB and OB/D subgroups (p<0.01, see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0007905#pone-0007905-t002" target="_blank"><b>TABLE 2</b></a>).…”
-
328
-
329
-
330
-
331
-
332
-
333
-
334
-
335
-
336
-
337
-
338
-
339
-
340