Search alternatives:
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
ng decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
10 ng » 10 mg (Expand Search), 10 nm (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
ng decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
10 ng » 10 mg (Expand Search), 10 nm (Expand Search)
-
201
-
202
-
203
-
204
-
205
-
206
rVλ6Wil fibrils cause a decrease in cardiomyocytes MTT reduction without inducing cell death.
Published 2015“…(C) Cell number, quantified using crystal violet (black) did not decrease over 72 h of incubation with 1 μM rVλ6Wil fibrils despite a decrease in MMT reduction (grey; n = 3 samples per time point). …”
-
207
-
208
-
209
-
210
-
211
OCA alone markedly decreases and combined with Gemcitabine or Cisplatin abrogates growth of iCCA xenografts.
Published 2019“…After 4 weeks, when the tumor size was approximately 100 mm<sup>3</sup> (T<sub>0</sub>) mice were treated with OCA (0.03% w/w, 30 mg/kg) alone or combined with Cisplatin (2.4 mg/Kg in 100 μl) or Gemcitabine (1.05 mg/Kg in 100 μl) for 5 additional weeks. a) Results are expressed as percent increase in tumor volume at different time points. …”
-
212
Flow diagram of the study.
Published 2023“…A total of 162 patients were included. The SOFA score on POD 5 was significantly higher in the High-decrease group compared with the Low-decrease group (5.2 ± 2.6 vs. 4.1 ± 2.3; mean difference: 1.1, 95% CI: 0.3 to 1.8; P = 0.005). …”
-
213
Baseline characteristics of patients.
Published 2023“…A total of 162 patients were included. The SOFA score on POD 5 was significantly higher in the High-decrease group compared with the Low-decrease group (5.2 ± 2.6 vs. 4.1 ± 2.3; mean difference: 1.1, 95% CI: 0.3 to 1.8; P = 0.005). …”
-
214
-
215
-
216
-
217
-
218
-
219
-
220