Showing 151,041 - 151,060 results of 232,337 for search '(( 10 we decrease ) OR ( 10 ((((ng decrease) OR (mean decrease))) OR (a decrease)) ))', query time: 2.30s Refine Results
  1. 151041
  2. 151042
  3. 151043
  4. 151044
  5. 151045

    DataSheet_1_Genetically Predicted Circulating Levels of Cytokines and the Risk of Cancer.docx by Jie Song (60883)

    Published 2022
    “…</p>Results<p>224 genetic variants associated with 27 circulating cytokines achieving genome-wide significance (P<5×10<sup>-8</sup>) were used as IVs. After Bonferroni correction, genetically predicted high levels of interleukin-18 (IL-18) were associated with a decreased risk of acute myeloid leukemia (odds ratio (OR) per 1 standard deviation (SD) increase = 0.55, 95% confidence interval (CI):0.43-0.69, P=5.39×10<sup>-7</sup>), and circulating levels of IL-17 were associated with altered stomach cancer risk (OR per 1 SD increase = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.07-0.36, P=1.25×10<sup>-5</sup>) by IVW. …”
  6. 151046

    Overall model framework. by Ke Yan (331581)

    Published 2024
    “…On the other hand, taking English writing teaching as an example, the proposed method is further verified by designing a comparative experiment in groups. The results show that: (1) From the experimental data of word sense disambiguation, the accuracy of the SMOSS-LSTM model proposed in this paper is the lowest when the context range is "3+3", then it rises in turn at "5+5" and "7+7", reaches the highest at "7+7", and then begins to decrease at "10+10"; (2) Compared with the control group, the accuracy of syntactic analysis in the experimental group reached 89.5%, while that in the control group was only 73.2%. (3) In the aspect of English text error detection, the detection accuracy of the proposed model in the experimental group is as high as 94.8%, which is significantly better than the traditional SMOSS-based text error detection method, and its accuracy is only 68.3%. (4) Compared with other existing researches, although it is slightly inferior to Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) in word sense disambiguation, this proposed model performs well in syntactic analysis and English text error detection, and its comprehensive performance is excellent. …”
  7. 151047

    Key parameters of LSTM training model. by Ke Yan (331581)

    Published 2024
    “…On the other hand, taking English writing teaching as an example, the proposed method is further verified by designing a comparative experiment in groups. The results show that: (1) From the experimental data of word sense disambiguation, the accuracy of the SMOSS-LSTM model proposed in this paper is the lowest when the context range is "3+3", then it rises in turn at "5+5" and "7+7", reaches the highest at "7+7", and then begins to decrease at "10+10"; (2) Compared with the control group, the accuracy of syntactic analysis in the experimental group reached 89.5%, while that in the control group was only 73.2%. (3) In the aspect of English text error detection, the detection accuracy of the proposed model in the experimental group is as high as 94.8%, which is significantly better than the traditional SMOSS-based text error detection method, and its accuracy is only 68.3%. (4) Compared with other existing researches, although it is slightly inferior to Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) in word sense disambiguation, this proposed model performs well in syntactic analysis and English text error detection, and its comprehensive performance is excellent. …”
  8. 151048

    Comparison chart of model evaluation results. by Ke Yan (331581)

    Published 2024
    “…On the other hand, taking English writing teaching as an example, the proposed method is further verified by designing a comparative experiment in groups. The results show that: (1) From the experimental data of word sense disambiguation, the accuracy of the SMOSS-LSTM model proposed in this paper is the lowest when the context range is "3+3", then it rises in turn at "5+5" and "7+7", reaches the highest at "7+7", and then begins to decrease at "10+10"; (2) Compared with the control group, the accuracy of syntactic analysis in the experimental group reached 89.5%, while that in the control group was only 73.2%. (3) In the aspect of English text error detection, the detection accuracy of the proposed model in the experimental group is as high as 94.8%, which is significantly better than the traditional SMOSS-based text error detection method, and its accuracy is only 68.3%. (4) Compared with other existing researches, although it is slightly inferior to Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) in word sense disambiguation, this proposed model performs well in syntactic analysis and English text error detection, and its comprehensive performance is excellent. …”
  9. 151049

    Model performance evaluation results. by Ke Yan (331581)

    Published 2024
    “…On the other hand, taking English writing teaching as an example, the proposed method is further verified by designing a comparative experiment in groups. The results show that: (1) From the experimental data of word sense disambiguation, the accuracy of the SMOSS-LSTM model proposed in this paper is the lowest when the context range is "3+3", then it rises in turn at "5+5" and "7+7", reaches the highest at "7+7", and then begins to decrease at "10+10"; (2) Compared with the control group, the accuracy of syntactic analysis in the experimental group reached 89.5%, while that in the control group was only 73.2%. (3) In the aspect of English text error detection, the detection accuracy of the proposed model in the experimental group is as high as 94.8%, which is significantly better than the traditional SMOSS-based text error detection method, and its accuracy is only 68.3%. (4) Compared with other existing researches, although it is slightly inferior to Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) in word sense disambiguation, this proposed model performs well in syntactic analysis and English text error detection, and its comprehensive performance is excellent. …”
  10. 151050

    The result compared with other existing methods. by Ke Yan (331581)

    Published 2024
    “…On the other hand, taking English writing teaching as an example, the proposed method is further verified by designing a comparative experiment in groups. The results show that: (1) From the experimental data of word sense disambiguation, the accuracy of the SMOSS-LSTM model proposed in this paper is the lowest when the context range is "3+3", then it rises in turn at "5+5" and "7+7", reaches the highest at "7+7", and then begins to decrease at "10+10"; (2) Compared with the control group, the accuracy of syntactic analysis in the experimental group reached 89.5%, while that in the control group was only 73.2%. (3) In the aspect of English text error detection, the detection accuracy of the proposed model in the experimental group is as high as 94.8%, which is significantly better than the traditional SMOSS-based text error detection method, and its accuracy is only 68.3%. (4) Compared with other existing researches, although it is slightly inferior to Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) in word sense disambiguation, this proposed model performs well in syntactic analysis and English text error detection, and its comprehensive performance is excellent. …”
  11. 151051

    Supplementary Material for: Pronounced State-Level Disparities in Prescription of Cannabinoids to Medicaid Patients by Liu E.Y. (16363629)

    Published 2023
    “…The spending on these drugs parallels that of their prescription trend with a 66.3% decrease in reimbursement for dronabinol ($5.7 million in 2020), whereas cannabidiol increased by +26,582.0% ($233.3 million in 2020). …”
  12. 151052
  13. 151053
  14. 151054
  15. 151055
  16. 151056
  17. 151057
  18. 151058
  19. 151059
  20. 151060