Showing 901 - 920 results of 31,388 for search '(( 100 ((ng decrease) OR (mean decrease)) ) OR ( 50 ((nn decrease) OR (a decrease)) ))', query time: 0.95s Refine Results
  1. 901
  2. 902
  3. 903
  4. 904
  5. 905

    A summary of calibration standards (n = 3). by Ewa Paszkowska (21246702)

    Published 2025
    “…The method was considered precise (with the following relative standard deviation values: 6.0–6.9% for SIM, and 8.1–12.9% for SIMA) and accurate (with the following mean accuracies: 91.4–100.1% for SIM, and 102.2–115.4% for SIMA). …”
  6. 906

    The observed MRM reactions. by Ewa Paszkowska (21246702)

    Published 2025
    “…The method was considered precise (with the following relative standard deviation values: 6.0–6.9% for SIM, and 8.1–12.9% for SIMA) and accurate (with the following mean accuracies: 91.4–100.1% for SIM, and 102.2–115.4% for SIMA). …”
  7. 907

    Intra- and inter-day precision and accuracy. by Ewa Paszkowska (21246702)

    Published 2025
    “…The method was considered precise (with the following relative standard deviation values: 6.0–6.9% for SIM, and 8.1–12.9% for SIMA) and accurate (with the following mean accuracies: 91.4–100.1% for SIM, and 102.2–115.4% for SIMA). …”
  8. 908
  9. 909

    Scatter plot for the absolute decrease in CS rates (A) and the relative decrease in CS rates (B) from 2008 to 2016 among hospitals in Guangzhou grouped by their baseline CS rates. by Xiaoyan Xia (560153)

    Published 2019
    “…One circle represents one hospital, with blue (<i>n</i> = 20), green (<i>n</i> = 36), orange (<i>n</i> = 34), and purple (<i>n</i> = 22) representing baseline CS rates of <30%, 30%–39%, 40%–49%, and ≥50%, respectively. The absolute decrease = the CS rate at baseline − the CS rate in Stage 2; the relative decrease = (the CS rate at baseline − the CS rate in Stage 2) ÷ the CS rate at baseline. …”
  10. 910
  11. 911
  12. 912
  13. 913
  14. 914
  15. 915
  16. 916
  17. 917
  18. 918
  19. 919
  20. 920