Search alternatives:
ng decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search), b1 decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
ng decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search), b1 decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
901
-
902
-
903
-
904
-
905
A summary of calibration standards (n = 3).
Published 2025“…The method was considered precise (with the following relative standard deviation values: 6.0–6.9% for SIM, and 8.1–12.9% for SIMA) and accurate (with the following mean accuracies: 91.4–100.1% for SIM, and 102.2–115.4% for SIMA). …”
-
906
The observed MRM reactions.
Published 2025“…The method was considered precise (with the following relative standard deviation values: 6.0–6.9% for SIM, and 8.1–12.9% for SIMA) and accurate (with the following mean accuracies: 91.4–100.1% for SIM, and 102.2–115.4% for SIMA). …”
-
907
Intra- and inter-day precision and accuracy.
Published 2025“…The method was considered precise (with the following relative standard deviation values: 6.0–6.9% for SIM, and 8.1–12.9% for SIMA) and accurate (with the following mean accuracies: 91.4–100.1% for SIM, and 102.2–115.4% for SIMA). …”
-
908
-
909
Scatter plot for the absolute decrease in CS rates (A) and the relative decrease in CS rates (B) from 2008 to 2016 among hospitals in Guangzhou grouped by their baseline CS rates.
Published 2019“…One circle represents one hospital, with blue (<i>n</i> = 20), green (<i>n</i> = 36), orange (<i>n</i> = 34), and purple (<i>n</i> = 22) representing baseline CS rates of <30%, 30%–39%, 40%–49%, and ≥50%, respectively. The absolute decrease = the CS rate at baseline − the CS rate in Stage 2; the relative decrease = (the CS rate at baseline − the CS rate in Stage 2) ÷ the CS rate at baseline. …”
-
910
-
911
-
912
-
913
-
914
-
915
-
916
-
917
-
918
-
919
-
920