Showing 61 - 80 results of 66,061 for search '(( 100 mean decrease ) OR ( 5 ((mean decrease) OR (((teer decrease) OR (a decrease)))) ))', query time: 0.95s Refine Results
  1. 61
  2. 62
  3. 63

    Mean decrease in accuracy (MDA) of top 15 urine metabolites. by Liam E. Broughton-Neiswanger (8447220)

    Published 2020
    “…Urine metabolites with a mean decrease in accuracy ≥ 0.004 in at least one post-treatment time point (2–5) were considered for inclusion in the predictive model.…”
  4. 64
  5. 65

    Alternative bounded and monotonically decreasing functions do not accurately fit the bias in the naïve SI. by Liron Sheintuch (12078310)

    Published 2022
    “…Data in A-C show the mean across 100 cells from one example simulation. …”
  6. 66
  7. 67

    Exposure to low CO<sub>2</sub> levels decreases ER cholesterol levels. by Nityanand Bolshette (17396845)

    Published 2023
    “…<b>(B)</b> Bioluminescence recordings from the different conditions as depicted in <b>(A)</b>, the arrow indicates the time CO<sub>2</sub> was shifted from 5% to 1% (mean ± SE, <i>n</i> = 4 biological replicates per condition, AUC for 0 mM 0.34 ± 0.007, 1.59 ± 0.004 (<i>P</i> < 0.0001), 0.5 mM 1.00 ± 0.023, 2.68 ± 0.04 (<i>P</i> < 0.0001), 1 mM 1.66 ± 0.07, 3.34 ± 0.04 (<i>P</i> < 0.0001), 3 mM 2.06 ± 0.02, 2.79 ± 0.07 (<i>P</i> < 0.0001), 5 mM 2.02 ± 0.05, 2.43 ± 0.06 (<i>P</i> < 0.002), 7 mM 1.85 ± 0.01, 1.77 ± 0.02 (<i>P</i> < 0.02) two-sided Student’s <i>t</i> test). …”
  8. 68

    Performance of the response detection algorithm at detecting simulated increases versus decreases in firing rate. by Bettina C. Schwab (9515382)

    Published 2020
    “…<p>Curves reflect the mean (±SD) fraction of increases and decreases detected as a function of the simulated response size (expressed as percent of baseline firing rate). …”
  9. 69
  10. 70
  11. 71

    Decreased projections to LP in <i>Brn3b</i> mutants occur postnatally. by Hyoseo Lee (17419987)

    Published 2023
    “…(<b>H</b>) Quantification (1.00 ± 0.09 for control, 0.45 ± 0.03 for cKO); unpaired two-tailed Student’s <i>t</i> test (mean ± SEM; <i>p</i> < 0.0001 [****] at P4/P5; <i>p</i> = 0.0004 [***] at P8/P9; <i>p</i> = 0.0012 [**] at P12/P13). …”
  12. 72
  13. 73
  14. 74
  15. 75
  16. 76
  17. 77
  18. 78
  19. 79

    The ratio between the bias in the naïve SI and shuffle SI decreases with tuning specificity, but not with sample size. by Liron Sheintuch (12078310)

    Published 2022
    “…Data pooled from N = 9 simulations, each corresponding to behavioral data from a different mouse. (B) The bias ratio (mean ± SEM) decreases as a function of the true SI for a sample size of 1 minute (blue), 5 minutes (cyan) and 20 minutes (green). …”
  20. 80