Search alternatives:
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
100 mean » 100 mpa (Expand Search), 100 head (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
100 mean » 100 mpa (Expand Search), 100 head (Expand Search)
-
61
-
62
-
63
Mean decrease in accuracy (MDA) of top 15 urine metabolites.
Published 2020“…Urine metabolites with a mean decrease in accuracy ≥ 0.004 in at least one post-treatment time point (2–5) were considered for inclusion in the predictive model.…”
-
64
-
65
Alternative bounded and monotonically decreasing functions do not accurately fit the bias in the naïve SI.
Published 2022“…Data in A-C show the mean across 100 cells from one example simulation. …”
-
66
-
67
Exposure to low CO<sub>2</sub> levels decreases ER cholesterol levels.
Published 2023“…<b>(B)</b> Bioluminescence recordings from the different conditions as depicted in <b>(A)</b>, the arrow indicates the time CO<sub>2</sub> was shifted from 5% to 1% (mean ± SE, <i>n</i> = 4 biological replicates per condition, AUC for 0 mM 0.34 ± 0.007, 1.59 ± 0.004 (<i>P</i> < 0.0001), 0.5 mM 1.00 ± 0.023, 2.68 ± 0.04 (<i>P</i> < 0.0001), 1 mM 1.66 ± 0.07, 3.34 ± 0.04 (<i>P</i> < 0.0001), 3 mM 2.06 ± 0.02, 2.79 ± 0.07 (<i>P</i> < 0.0001), 5 mM 2.02 ± 0.05, 2.43 ± 0.06 (<i>P</i> < 0.002), 7 mM 1.85 ± 0.01, 1.77 ± 0.02 (<i>P</i> < 0.02) two-sided Student’s <i>t</i> test). …”
-
68
Performance of the response detection algorithm at detecting simulated increases versus decreases in firing rate.
Published 2020“…<p>Curves reflect the mean (±SD) fraction of increases and decreases detected as a function of the simulated response size (expressed as percent of baseline firing rate). …”
-
69
-
70
-
71
Decreased projections to LP in <i>Brn3b</i> mutants occur postnatally.
Published 2023“…(<b>H</b>) Quantification (1.00 ± 0.09 for control, 0.45 ± 0.03 for cKO); unpaired two-tailed Student’s <i>t</i> test (mean ± SEM; <i>p</i> < 0.0001 [****] at P4/P5; <i>p</i> = 0.0004 [***] at P8/P9; <i>p</i> = 0.0012 [**] at P12/P13). …”
-
72
-
73
-
74
-
75
-
76
-
77
-
78
-
79
The ratio between the bias in the naïve SI and shuffle SI decreases with tuning specificity, but not with sample size.
Published 2022“…Data pooled from N = 9 simulations, each corresponding to behavioral data from a different mouse. (B) The bias ratio (mean ± SEM) decreases as a function of the true SI for a sample size of 1 minute (blue), 5 minutes (cyan) and 20 minutes (green). …”
-
80