Search alternatives:
greater decrease » greater increase (Expand Search), greater increases (Expand Search), rate decreased (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
12 greater » _ greater (Expand Search), a greater (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greater increase (Expand Search), greater increases (Expand Search), rate decreased (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
12 greater » _ greater (Expand Search), a greater (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
41
-
42
Mean decrease in accuracy (MDA) of top 15 urine metabolites.
Published 2020“…Urine metabolites with a mean decrease in accuracy ≥ 0.004 in at least one post-treatment time point (2–5) were considered for inclusion in the predictive model.…”
-
43
-
44
-
45
-
46
-
47
-
48
-
49
-
50
Resveratrol decreased intracellular levels of R5P.
Published 2013“…<p>R5P is a pentose phosphate pathway intermediate, an important marker for anabolism (nucleotide biosynthesis). …”
-
51
Decreased Tks5 expression results in neural crest-derived defects.
Published 2011“…<p>(A–B) Melanophores within the trunk region above the yolk sac extension in control MO-injected and Tks5 MO-injected embryos were qualitatively (A) and quantitatively (B) analyzed. n = 15 embryos and SEM is shown by bar. p values obtained from Student's t-test. ** denotes p<0.01. …”
-
52
-
53
Quantitation demonstrates the overlap of WFA ‘patches’ and striosomes decreases during early postnatal development.
Published 2013“…Although ‘patches’ remain overwhelmingly associated with striosomes (Student's <i>t</i>-test; P = 2.1063×10<sup>−5</sup>), the absolute area of overlap with both neostriatal subcompartments has dropped significantly by this time compared with P4 (note difference in scale for A and B; Two-way ANOVA, age and subregion as factors; F(1, 32) = 96.65, P = 3.4327×10<sup>−11</sup> across ages; F(1, 32) = 119.2, P = 2.5329×10<sup>−12</sup> across subregions; F(1, 32) = 52.2, P = 3.3113×10<sup>−8</sup> for interactions between age and subregion). …”
-
54
-
55
-
56
-
57
-
58
-
59
-
60