Metformin attenuates high glucose-induced injury in islet microvascular endothelial cells by Wenyu Zou (12070022)

THE CURATIVE EFFECT OF TRADITIONAL CHINESE MEDICINE COMPOUNDED MEDICATIONS IN RELIEVING RACEWALKING FATIGUE by Tao Ma (88669)

Impact of urinary selective antibiogram in primary care by Margarida Pereira (10407280)

Influence of animal fat substitution by vegetal fat on Mortadella-type products formulated with different hydrocolloids by Erick Saldaña (10442588)

Image_9_Socioeconomic inequality in organized and opportunistic screening for gastric cancer: results from the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey 2009–2022.TIF by Xuan Quy Luu (17115106)

“…</p>Results<p>The organized screening rate for GC increased from 38.2% in 2009 to 70.8% in 2022, whereas the opportunistic screening rate decreased from 18.8 to 4.5%. Regarding educational inequality, a negative SII value was observed [−3.5, 95% confidence interval (CI), −7.63–0.83%] in organized screening, while a positive SII (9.30%; 95% CI, 6.69–11.91%) and RII (1.98%; 95% CI, 1.59–2.46) were observed in opportunistic screening. …”

Table_4_Transcriptome Analysis During Follicle Development in Turkey Hens With Low and High Egg Production.xls by Kristen Brady (251981)

Image_1_Transcriptome Analysis During Follicle Development in Turkey Hens With Low and High Egg Production.png by Kristen Brady (251981)

Table_1_Socioeconomic inequality in organized and opportunistic screening for gastric cancer: results from the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey 2009–2022.docx by Xuan Quy Luu (17115106)

“…</p>Results<p>The organized screening rate for GC increased from 38.2% in 2009 to 70.8% in 2022, whereas the opportunistic screening rate decreased from 18.8 to 4.5%. Regarding educational inequality, a negative SII value was observed [−3.5, 95% confidence interval (CI), −7.63–0.83%] in organized screening, while a positive SII (9.30%; 95% CI, 6.69–11.91%) and RII (1.98%; 95% CI, 1.59–2.46) were observed in opportunistic screening. …”

Image_7_Socioeconomic inequality in organized and opportunistic screening for gastric cancer: results from the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey 2009–2022.TIF by Xuan Quy Luu (17115106)

“…</p>Results<p>The organized screening rate for GC increased from 38.2% in 2009 to 70.8% in 2022, whereas the opportunistic screening rate decreased from 18.8 to 4.5%. Regarding educational inequality, a negative SII value was observed [−3.5, 95% confidence interval (CI), −7.63–0.83%] in organized screening, while a positive SII (9.30%; 95% CI, 6.69–11.91%) and RII (1.98%; 95% CI, 1.59–2.46) were observed in opportunistic screening. …”

Image_6_Socioeconomic inequality in organized and opportunistic screening for gastric cancer: results from the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey 2009–2022.TIF by Xuan Quy Luu (17115106)

“…</p>Results<p>The organized screening rate for GC increased from 38.2% in 2009 to 70.8% in 2022, whereas the opportunistic screening rate decreased from 18.8 to 4.5%. Regarding educational inequality, a negative SII value was observed [−3.5, 95% confidence interval (CI), −7.63–0.83%] in organized screening, while a positive SII (9.30%; 95% CI, 6.69–11.91%) and RII (1.98%; 95% CI, 1.59–2.46) were observed in opportunistic screening. …”

Blood pressure effects of ephedrine treatment. by Daniel Radiloff (588253)

“…<p>“Pre-injection” were averaged data −5 to 0 minutes pre injection, “post injection” was averaged −5 to 0 minutes before onset of hypoxia, and “hypoxia” was averaged 30–40 minutes post injection. …”

Image_3_Socioeconomic inequality in organized and opportunistic screening for gastric cancer: results from the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey 2009–2022.TIF by Xuan Quy Luu (17115106)

“…</p>Results<p>The organized screening rate for GC increased from 38.2% in 2009 to 70.8% in 2022, whereas the opportunistic screening rate decreased from 18.8 to 4.5%. Regarding educational inequality, a negative SII value was observed [−3.5, 95% confidence interval (CI), −7.63–0.83%] in organized screening, while a positive SII (9.30%; 95% CI, 6.69–11.91%) and RII (1.98%; 95% CI, 1.59–2.46) were observed in opportunistic screening. …”

Image_8_Socioeconomic inequality in organized and opportunistic screening for gastric cancer: results from the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey 2009–2022.TIF by Xuan Quy Luu (17115106)

“…</p>Results<p>The organized screening rate for GC increased from 38.2% in 2009 to 70.8% in 2022, whereas the opportunistic screening rate decreased from 18.8 to 4.5%. Regarding educational inequality, a negative SII value was observed [−3.5, 95% confidence interval (CI), −7.63–0.83%] in organized screening, while a positive SII (9.30%; 95% CI, 6.69–11.91%) and RII (1.98%; 95% CI, 1.59–2.46) were observed in opportunistic screening. …”

Image_1_Socioeconomic inequality in organized and opportunistic screening for gastric cancer: results from the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey 2009–2022.TIF by Xuan Quy Luu (17115106)

“…</p>Results<p>The organized screening rate for GC increased from 38.2% in 2009 to 70.8% in 2022, whereas the opportunistic screening rate decreased from 18.8 to 4.5%. Regarding educational inequality, a negative SII value was observed [−3.5, 95% confidence interval (CI), −7.63–0.83%] in organized screening, while a positive SII (9.30%; 95% CI, 6.69–11.91%) and RII (1.98%; 95% CI, 1.59–2.46) were observed in opportunistic screening. …”

Data_Sheet_1_Big data help to define climate change challenges for the typical Mediterranean species Cistus ladanifer L..docx by Alice Maria Almeida (11596969)

“…The potential area of occurrence of the species is equal to 15.8 and 14.1% of the study area for current and LIG conditions, while it decreased to 3.8% in the LGM. The species’ presence diaminished more than half in the RCP 4.5 (to 6.8% in 2050 and 7% in 2070), and a too low figure (2.2%) in the worst-case scenario (RCP 8.5) for 2070. …”

Table_1_Transcriptome Analysis During Follicle Development in Turkey Hens With Low and High Egg Production.xls by Kristen Brady (251981)

Image_10_Socioeconomic inequality in organized and opportunistic screening for gastric cancer: results from the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey 2009–2022.TIF by Xuan Quy Luu (17115106)

“…</p>Results<p>The organized screening rate for GC increased from 38.2% in 2009 to 70.8% in 2022, whereas the opportunistic screening rate decreased from 18.8 to 4.5%. Regarding educational inequality, a negative SII value was observed [−3.5, 95% confidence interval (CI), −7.63–0.83%] in organized screening, while a positive SII (9.30%; 95% CI, 6.69–11.91%) and RII (1.98%; 95% CI, 1.59–2.46) were observed in opportunistic screening. …”

Image_2_Socioeconomic inequality in organized and opportunistic screening for gastric cancer: results from the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey 2009–2022.TIF by Xuan Quy Luu (17115106)

“…</p>Results<p>The organized screening rate for GC increased from 38.2% in 2009 to 70.8% in 2022, whereas the opportunistic screening rate decreased from 18.8 to 4.5%. Regarding educational inequality, a negative SII value was observed [−3.5, 95% confidence interval (CI), −7.63–0.83%] in organized screening, while a positive SII (9.30%; 95% CI, 6.69–11.91%) and RII (1.98%; 95% CI, 1.59–2.46) were observed in opportunistic screening. …”

Functional Metagenomics of the Bronchial Microbiome in COPD by Laura Millares (833379)

“…Four functional categories showed statistically significant differences with MG-RAST at KEGG level 2: in exacerbation, <i>Cell growth and Death</i> and <i>Transport and Catabolism</i> decreased in abundance [1.6 (0.2–2.3) <i>vs</i> 3.6 (3.3–6.9), p = 0.012; and 1.8 (0–3.3) <i>vs</i> 3.6 (1.8–5.1), p = 0.025 respectively], while <i>Cancer</i> and <i>Carbohydrate Metabolism</i> increased [0.8 (0–1.5) <i>vs</i> 0 (0–0.5), p = 0.043; and 7 (6.4–9) <i>vs</i> 5.9 (6.3–6.1), p = 0.012 respectively]. …”

Image_4_Socioeconomic inequality in organized and opportunistic screening for gastric cancer: results from the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey 2009–2022.TIF by Xuan Quy Luu (17115106)

“…</p>Results<p>The organized screening rate for GC increased from 38.2% in 2009 to 70.8% in 2022, whereas the opportunistic screening rate decreased from 18.8 to 4.5%. Regarding educational inequality, a negative SII value was observed [−3.5, 95% confidence interval (CI), −7.63–0.83%] in organized screening, while a positive SII (9.30%; 95% CI, 6.69–11.91%) and RII (1.98%; 95% CI, 1.59–2.46) were observed in opportunistic screening. …”