Search alternatives:
greater decrease » greater increase (Expand Search), greater increases (Expand Search), rate decreased (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
12 mean » 12 men (Expand Search), 2012 mean (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greater increase (Expand Search), greater increases (Expand Search), rate decreased (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
12 mean » 12 men (Expand Search), 2012 mean (Expand Search)
-
21
-
22
Claudin V is decreased following infection with Mtb.
Published 2024“…<p>Immunofluorescent staining of guinea pig brain tissue for DAPI (blue) and claudin V (cyan) in vessels was performed. Representative images of the frontal cortex (A–D), cerebral nuclei (F–I), brain stem (K–N), thalamus (P–S), and hippocampus (U–X) 15 days post-infection are shown. …”
-
23
-
24
-
25
-
26
-
27
Inflammation is not sufficient to account for decreased relative bacterial numbers in higher dose infection.
Published 2012“…D) CCR2 KO animals exhibited a significant decrease in the number of recruited Ly6c+/CD11b+/CD11c+ monocytes at day 9 PI in high dose infection. …”
-
28
-
29
-
30
-
31
-
32
-
33
TITAN decreaser diatom heatmap.
Published 2025“…., <i>z-</i>) diatom taxa (y-axis) to at least one of the five stressors, in decreasing order of number of stressor responses. …”
-
34
Quantitation demonstrates the overlap of WFA ‘patches’ and striosomes decreases during early postnatal development.
Published 2013“…Although ‘patches’ remain overwhelmingly associated with striosomes (Student's <i>t</i>-test; P = 2.1063×10<sup>−5</sup>), the absolute area of overlap with both neostriatal subcompartments has dropped significantly by this time compared with P4 (note difference in scale for A and B; Two-way ANOVA, age and subregion as factors; F(1, 32) = 96.65, P = 3.4327×10<sup>−11</sup> across ages; F(1, 32) = 119.2, P = 2.5329×10<sup>−12</sup> across subregions; F(1, 32) = 52.2, P = 3.3113×10<sup>−8</sup> for interactions between age and subregion). …”
-
35
-
36
-
37
-
38
Flowchart of the analysis steps and methods used in the study (see details in sections 2.1 to 2.5).
Published 2025Subjects: -
39
-
40