Showing 98,121 - 98,140 results of 101,517 for search '(( 12 men decrease ) OR ( 5 ((((mean decrease) OR (nn decrease))) OR (a decrease)) ))', query time: 1.63s Refine Results
  1. 98121
  2. 98122
  3. 98123
  4. 98124
  5. 98125
  6. 98126
  7. 98127
  8. 98128

    Image_1_T-Cell Receptor Profiling and Prognosis After Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy For Stage I Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.tif by Lirong Wu (3512831)

    Published 2021
    “…All patients received definitive SBRT to a biologically effective dose of >=100 Gy. The number of unique TCR clones was decreased after SBRT versus before, but clonality and the Shannon Entropy did not change. …”
  9. 98129

    Image_4_T-Cell Receptor Profiling and Prognosis After Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy For Stage I Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.tif by Lirong Wu (3512831)

    Published 2021
    “…All patients received definitive SBRT to a biologically effective dose of >=100 Gy. The number of unique TCR clones was decreased after SBRT versus before, but clonality and the Shannon Entropy did not change. …”
  10. 98130

    Image_3_T-Cell Receptor Profiling and Prognosis After Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy For Stage I Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.tif by Lirong Wu (3512831)

    Published 2021
    “…All patients received definitive SBRT to a biologically effective dose of >=100 Gy. The number of unique TCR clones was decreased after SBRT versus before, but clonality and the Shannon Entropy did not change. …”
  11. 98131

    Image_2_T-Cell Receptor Profiling and Prognosis After Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy For Stage I Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.tif by Lirong Wu (3512831)

    Published 2021
    “…All patients received definitive SBRT to a biologically effective dose of >=100 Gy. The number of unique TCR clones was decreased after SBRT versus before, but clonality and the Shannon Entropy did not change. …”
  12. 98132

    Table_1_T-Cell Receptor Profiling and Prognosis After Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy For Stage I Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.docx by Lirong Wu (3512831)

    Published 2021
    “…All patients received definitive SBRT to a biologically effective dose of >=100 Gy. The number of unique TCR clones was decreased after SBRT versus before, but clonality and the Shannon Entropy did not change. …”
  13. 98133

    Genome-wide complementary agonist and antagonist screens of host-encoded miRNAs impacting henipavirus infection at BSL-4. by Chwan Hong Foo (2571913)

    Published 2016
    “…(B and C) Results from the miRNA agonist (B) and antagonist (C) screens, with miRNAs ranked using a robust Z-score approach, from lowest (decreased virus infection) to highest (increased virus infection). …”
  14. 98134
  15. 98135

    DataSheet_1_Preliminary Safety and Potential Effect of 6B11-OCIK Adoptive Cell Therapy Against Platinum-Resistant Recurrent or Refractory Ovarian Cancer.docx by Hongyan Cheng (445898)

    Published 2021
    “…We found that 6B11-OCIK treatment was safe and well tolerated after five cycles of intravenous infusion with an initial dose of 1–2×10<sup>9</sup> cells and a dose-climbing strategy. …”
  16. 98136
  17. 98137

    Image_1_Preliminary Safety and Potential Effect of 6B11-OCIK Adoptive Cell Therapy Against Platinum-Resistant Recurrent or Refractory Ovarian Cancer.tif by Hongyan Cheng (445898)

    Published 2021
    “…We found that 6B11-OCIK treatment was safe and well tolerated after five cycles of intravenous infusion with an initial dose of 1–2×10<sup>9</sup> cells and a dose-climbing strategy. …”
  18. 98138

    Image_3_Preliminary Safety and Potential Effect of 6B11-OCIK Adoptive Cell Therapy Against Platinum-Resistant Recurrent or Refractory Ovarian Cancer.tif by Hongyan Cheng (445898)

    Published 2021
    “…We found that 6B11-OCIK treatment was safe and well tolerated after five cycles of intravenous infusion with an initial dose of 1–2×10<sup>9</sup> cells and a dose-climbing strategy. …”
  19. 98139
  20. 98140

    Table of parameters used in modelling. by Christian Morgenstern (8709894)

    Published 2024
    “…Here, we study the interaction of SARS-CoV-2 transmission, mortality, and economic output between January 2020 and December 2022 across 25 European countries.…”