Search alternatives:
men decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), meja decreased (Expand Search)
wt decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), awd decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
12 men » 10 men (Expand Search), 42 men (Expand Search)
men decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), meja decreased (Expand Search)
wt decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), awd decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
12 men » 10 men (Expand Search), 42 men (Expand Search)
-
561
-
562
-
563
-
564
-
565
-
566
-
567
-
568
-
569
S5 File -
Published 2025“…Diagnoses included: radiation proctopathy (n = 18); bile acid malabsorption (n = 15); fructose or lactose intolerance and/or small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (n = 20); vitamin B12/D deficiency (n = 20). Increases in quality of life, sexual activity and/or sexual function, and decrease in specific symptoms (e.g. bowel-related or urinary) between 6 and 12 months were observed. …”
-
570
-
571
-
572
-
573
-
574
-
575
Decreased Tks5 expression results in neural crest-derived defects.
Published 2011“…<p>(A–B) Melanophores within the trunk region above the yolk sac extension in control MO-injected and Tks5 MO-injected embryos were qualitatively (A) and quantitatively (B) analyzed. n = 15 embryos and SEM is shown by bar. p values obtained from Student's t-test. ** denotes p<0.01. …”
-
576
-
577
-
578
-
579
Heterozygous and homozygous loss of TCF4 leads to dendritic spine density decrease in the adult brain.
Published 2018“…In stratum radiatum of CA1 (right) <i>Tcf4</i><sup><i>fl/fl</i></sup> display decreased spine density compared to WT; n = 6 mice *p < 0.05. …”
-
580