Search alternatives:
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search)
mm decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
12 mm » 10 mm (Expand Search), 2 mm (Expand Search), 15 mm (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search)
mm decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
12 mm » 10 mm (Expand Search), 2 mm (Expand Search), 15 mm (Expand Search)
-
1361
Allelic loss of <i>Cdh11</i> led to faster growing tumors due to decreased cell death.
Published 2010“…<p>(A) The number of single tumor initiating cells at PND8 was estimated by averaging the total number of TAg-positive cells in 5 mice per genotype. …”
-
1362
-
1363
-
1364
-
1365
-
1366
PDGF-BB maintains Bcl2/Bax ratio and decreases caspase-3 activation induced by Tat and morphine.
Published 2011“…(B) Densitometric analysis of the blots shown in (A). Tat and morphine together resulted in a significantly decreased ratio of Bcl2/Bax, indicating cell's progress towards apoptosis. …”
-
1367
-
1368
-
1369
-
1370
-
1371
-
1372
-
1373
-
1374
-
1375
-
1376
PLD2 and mTORC2 are required to convert increases in membrane tension to decreases in actin network assembly.
Published 2016“…Boxes in all box plots (B) extend from the 25th to 75th percentiles, with a line at the median. Whiskers extend to ×1.5 IQR (interquartile range) or the max/min data points if they fall within ×1.5 IQR.…”
-
1377
-
1378
-
1379
-
1380
Flow diagram of the study.
Published 2023“…A total of 162 patients were included. The SOFA score on POD 5 was significantly higher in the High-decrease group compared with the Low-decrease group (5.2 ± 2.6 vs. 4.1 ± 2.3; mean difference: 1.1, 95% CI: 0.3 to 1.8; P = 0.005). …”