Search alternatives:
mm decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
ng decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
12 mm » 10 mm (Expand Search), 2 mm (Expand Search), 15 mm (Expand Search)
mm decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
ng decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
12 mm » 10 mm (Expand Search), 2 mm (Expand Search), 15 mm (Expand Search)
-
1561
Decrease in cell viability by siRNA and miRNA dependent induction of DTA.
Published 2014“…<p>U251 cells were transfected with the indicated construct (50 ng) with (A) or without (B) siRNAs (10pmol). Cell viability was determined by an XTT assay. …”
-
1562
-
1563
-
1564
-
1565
-
1566
-
1567
-
1568
Overexpressions of the AB domain of RPA70 and the β-barrel domain of Ku70 significantly decrease HBoV1 replication in HAE-ALI.
Published 2022“…Duplex HBoV1 genome was loaded as a size marker (M) of 5.5 kb. …”
-
1569
-
1570
-
1571
-
1572
-
1573
-
1574
-
1575
Pretreatment with terazosin (0.5, 1 mg/kg) reversed the decrease in EEG amplitude produced by modafinil (90 mg/kg, i.p.).
Published 2013“…The increase in EEG amplitude may be interpreted as synchronization and a decrease in EEG can be interpreted as a desynchronization. …”
-
1576
IGFBP-3 decreases vascular tone by activating scavenger receptor-B1.
Published 2013“…A significant decrease in myogenic tone was observed at 100 (*P<0.02, n = 5) and 300 ng/ml (**P<0.01, n = 5) IGFBP-3. …”
-
1577
-
1578
-
1579
The wound healing microenvironment restored GJIC but did not directly decrease tumor cells.
Published 2015“…(B and C) The combination of three compounds led to angiogenesis and optimal fibroblast proliferation but did not directly decrease A549 cancer cells. The results are presented as mean±SE (n = 5/group) **<i>p</i> < 0.01 <i>vs</i> control group.…”
-
1580